All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: asmadeus@codewreck.org
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Add new options to Documentation
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 03:22:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCnH/HRprV13ugHc@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5898218.pUKYPoVZaQ@silver>

Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 04:07:51PM +0200:
> > So, mapping of existing (deprecated) legacy modes:
> > - none (obvious) write_policy=writethrough
> > - *readahead -> cache=file cache_validate_open write_policy=writethrough
> > - mmap -> cache=file cache_validate=open write_policy=writeback
> 
> Mmm, why is that "file"? To me "file" sounds like any access to files is
> cached, whereas cache=mmap just uses the cache if mmap() was called, not for
> any other file access.

The semantics are slightly different but I don't think anyone would
mind; mmap was introduced as a way of having minimal caching but file
caching + /sys/class/bdi/9p*/max_bytes to 0 should be almost identical
once we've made sure our cache code sends bigger than 4k writes at a
time (I *think* that's still a problem and there was netfs work in the
ways, but you'd have noticed?)

--
Dominique

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-02 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-27  3:05 [PATCH] fs/9p: Add new options to Documentation Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-03-27 15:38 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-03-28 15:51   ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-04-02 14:07     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-04-02 18:22       ` asmadeus [this message]
2023-04-02 18:43       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-04-04 18:26       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCnH/HRprV13ugHc@codewreck.org \
    --to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.