All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Nitin Tekchandani <nitin.tekchandani@intel.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: Make tg->load_avg per node
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:25:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCve4JaH8EhxBcwQ@chenyu5-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327053955.GA570404@ziqianlu-desk2>

On 2023-03-27 at 13:39:55 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance
> with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times
> update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on
> cpus of one node of a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids:
> 
>     10.01%     9.86%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_cfs_group
>      7.84%     7.43%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_load_avg
> 
> While cpus of the other node normally sees a lower cycle percent:
> 
>      4.46%     4.36%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_cfs_group
>      4.02%     3.40%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_load_avg
> 
> Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg
> with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being
> the read side.
> 
> The reason why only cpus of one node has bigger overhead is: task_group
> is allocated on demand from a slab and whichever cpu happens to do the
> allocation, the allocated tg will be located on that node and accessing
> to tg->load_avg will have a lower cost for cpus on the same node and
> a higer cost for cpus of the remote node.
> 
> Tim Chen told me that PeterZ once mentioned a way to solve a similar
> problem by making a counter per node so do the same for tg->load_avg.
> After this change, the worst number I saw during a 5 minutes run from
> both nodes are:
> 
>      2.77%     2.11%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_load_avg
>      2.72%     2.59%  [kernel.vmlinux]        [k] update_cfs_group
>
The same issue was found when running netperf on this platform.
According to the perf profile:

11.90%    11.84%  swapper          [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] update_cfs_group
9.79%     9.43%  swapper           [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] update_load_avg

these two functions took quite some cycles.

1. cpufreq governor set to performance, turbo disabled, C6 disabled
2. launches 224 instances of netperf, and each instance is:
   netperf -4 -H 127.0.0.1 -t UDP_RR/TCP_RR -c -C -l 100 & 
3. perf record -ag sleep 4

Also the test script could be downloaded via
https://github.com/yu-chen-surf/schedtests.git


thanks,
Chenyu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-27  5:39 [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: Make tg->load_avg per node Aaron Lu
2023-03-27 14:45 ` Chen Yu
2023-03-28  6:42   ` Aaron Lu
2023-03-28 12:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-03-28 12:56   ` Aaron Lu
2023-03-29 12:36     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-03-29 13:54       ` Aaron Lu
2023-03-30 17:45         ` Daniel Jordan
2023-03-30 19:51           ` Daniel Jordan
2023-03-31  4:06             ` Aaron Lu
2023-03-31 15:48               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-04-03  7:53                 ` Aaron Lu
2023-04-05 21:04               ` Daniel Jordan
2023-04-12 12:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-20 20:52             ` Daniel Jordan
2023-04-21 15:05               ` Aaron Lu
2023-05-03 19:41                 ` Daniel Jordan
2023-05-04 10:27                   ` Aaron Lu
2023-05-16  7:50                     ` Aaron Lu
2023-05-16  8:57                       ` Chen Yu
2023-05-16 11:32                         ` Aaron Lu
2023-03-29 14:55       ` Chen Yu
2023-04-04  8:25 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2023-04-04 13:33   ` Aaron Lu
2023-04-04 15:15 ` Aaron Lu
2023-04-04 15:37   ` Chen Yu
2023-04-05 21:31   ` Daniel Jordan
2023-04-12 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-12 13:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-12 14:11     ` Aaron Lu
2023-04-12 14:01   ` Aaron Lu
2023-04-22  4:01 ` Chen Yu
2023-04-22  6:04   ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCve4JaH8EhxBcwQ@chenyu5-mobl1 \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nitin.tekchandani@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.