All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Teo Couprie Diaz <teo.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] setpgid02: Use pid_max as PGID for EPERM
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:00:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZD/JxunXsz7Lms9U@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418130944.181716-1-teo.coupriediaz@arm.com>

Hi!
> In some simple systems (like Busybox), the login shell might be run
> as init (PID 1).
> This leads to a case where LTP is run in the same session as init,
> thus setpgid is allowed to the PGID of init which results in a test fail.
> Indeed, the test retrieves the PGID of init to try and generate EPERM.
> 
> Instead, get the PGID we use to generate EPERM from the kernel pid_max.
> It should not be used by any process, guaranteeing a different session
> and generating an EPERM error.

So I suppose that we hit slightly different condition in the kernel:

        if (pgid != pid) {
                struct task_struct *g;

                pgrp = find_vpid(pgid);
                g = pid_task(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID);
                if (!g || task_session(g) != task_session(group_leader))
                        goto out;
        }

Previously we were supposed to hit the task_session(g) !=
task_session(group_leader) now we hit !g.

Also I guess that the only way to hit the second part of the condition
is to actually open and initialize a pty so that we have a process
outside of the current session.

The patch itself looks okay, but we should at least update the
documentation comment such as:

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setpgid/setpgid02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setpgid/setpgid02.c
index 4b63afee8..68b663633 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setpgid/setpgid02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setpgid/setpgid02.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
  * - EINVAL when given pgid is less than 0.
  * - ESRCH when pid is not the calling process and not a child of
  * the calling process.
- * - EPERM when an attempt was made to move a process into a process
- * group in a different session.
+ * - EPERM when an attempt was made to move a process into a nonexisting
+ *   process group.
  */

And ideally write a test for the second case as well.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 13:09 [LTP] [PATCH] setpgid02: Use pid_max as PGID for EPERM Teo Couprie Diaz
2023-04-19  8:25 ` Li Wang
2023-04-19 11:00 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2023-04-19 11:11   ` Li Wang
2023-04-19 12:40     ` Teo Couprie Diaz
2023-04-20  8:50       ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZD/JxunXsz7Lms9U@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=teo.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.