Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] timer: Add comment to get_next_timer_interrupt() description

[Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>]

Le Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:17:28PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > get_next_timer_interrupt() does more than simply getting the next timer
> > > interrupt. The timer bases are forwarded and also marked as idle whenever
> > > possible.
> > > 
> > > To get not confused, add a comment to function description.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > v5: New patch, which adds only a comment to get_next_timer_interrupt()
> > > instead of changing the function name
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/time/timer.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > > index 63a8ce7177dd..ffb94bc3852f 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > > @@ -1915,6 +1915,10 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
> > >   * @basej:	base time jiffies
> > >   * @basem:	base time clock monotonic
> > >   *
> > > + * If required, base->clk is forwarded and base is also marked as
> > > + * idle. Idle handling of timer bases is allowed only to be done by CPU
> > > + * itself.
> > 
> > Idle marking you mean? Because idle handling can be done remotely after
> > this patchset.
> > 
> 
> Jupp, will change idle handling to "idle marking".

Thanks and then please add:

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

(Trying to mark patches I don't need to review again on the next take :-)