All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] xe & i915 display integration cleanups
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:33:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEBCGWMjfgsj/v0m@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419123947.543175-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:39:38PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Change the way i915 display gets built for xe. Additional cleanups and
> backports on top to make future changes simpler.

Everything looks clean to me. Let's push this.

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

I was going to do a local rebase --autosquash, but I will wait
this to land.

> 
> Jani Nikula (9):
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915/wm: remove stale and unused ilk_wm_max_level() declaration
>   drm/i915/display: add I915 conditional build to i9xx_wm.h
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915: rename intel_pm.[ch] to intel_clock_gating.[ch]
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915: use explicit includes for i915_reg.h and i915_irq.h
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.h        |  18 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   4 +-
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    |   1 +
>  .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c   |   1 +
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_reg_defs.h |   4 -
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h    |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c      |   1 +
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_fifo_underrun.c    |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c         |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c            |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c               |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.h               |   2 +-
>  .../i915/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_clock_gating.h     |  14 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h               |  18 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/vlv_suspend.c            |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile                   | 170 +++++++++---------
>  .../compat-i915-headers/intel_clock_gating.h  |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c     |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.c      |  24 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.h      |  20 ---
>  .../ext/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c}  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pm.h     |  29 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h          |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c               |   4 +-
>  33 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} (99%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_clock_gating.h
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_clock_gating.h
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.c
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.h
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} (97%)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pm.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19 12:39 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] xe & i915 display integration cleanups Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 21:56   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-20  8:49     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-21 21:27       ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-24 11:41         ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/wm: remove stale and unused ilk_wm_max_level() declaration Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 19:49     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 19:50     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/display: add I915 conditional build to i9xx_wm.h Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: rename intel_pm.[ch] to intel_clock_gating.[ch] Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: use explicit includes for i915_reg.h and i915_irq.h Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:36   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 9/9] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:43 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe & i915 display integration cleanups Patchwork
2023-04-19 12:44 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-04-19 12:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-04-19 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-04-19 19:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-04-20 19:30 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-20 19:59   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-21 21:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for xe & i915 display integration cleanups (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEBCGWMjfgsj/v0m@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.