From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68B61844 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 04:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0016C433D2; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 04:02:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1681963336; bh=4be8Vmw4Xr7f1Xkb+YKX82snsvYgeZSDSgMs/ZlMiw8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XCvbnghgf+e8NRhLYe+Zpmqxw1So9qWZnVLNicp1MY4d9VEraPbAsv6B/up9eKlyx FwMG8FcMpVGXTOyIrVeLhRQx6te9YfIes8t8cvgFKAnVQ43IP1iAHkUaY0jwGQ/56L rflxqwvrSMIo+6ojHiqtxelUhZGiuYwLffkmJyHfPZIIMpjG9qyDoAI4uqamlzR/R+ P1rq/x+/0BpM2m+zeJDrFfgOHOCPbt6ZpLysoIJIiNUZIa3KGxMkcmzpNxlT4nLvWV GFyGjgNQnkVz5eoRV1Fj9YnKRA7tRbXqFNSQ09YRNiEThqelXqp3sU5GosH9dY6xiO 7D3jMvKgBlEAQ== Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:02:12 -0700 From: Saeed Mahameed To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Paul Moore , Leon Romanovsky , Linux regressions mailing list , Shay Drory , netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan Subject: Re: Potential regression/bug in net/mlx5 driver Message-ID: References: <20230413155139.22d3b2f4@kernel.org> <20230413202631.7e3bd713@kernel.org> <20230414173445.0800b7cf@kernel.org> <20230417083825.6e034c75@kernel.org> <20230419174625.280a6ed9@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230419174625.280a6ed9@kernel.org> On 19 Apr 17:46, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:43:11 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote: >> So I checked with Arch and we agreed that the only devices that need to >> expose this management PF are Bluefield chips, which have dedicated device >> IDs, and newer than the affected FW, so we can fix this by making the check >> more strict by testing device IDs as well. >> >> I will provide a patch by tomorrow, will let Paul test it first. > >What's "by tomorrow"? Today COB or some time tomorrow? >Paolo is sending the PR tomorrow, fix needs to be on the list *now*. I just saw you applied the revert, anyway here's our proposal: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230420035652.295680-1-saeed@kernel.org/ We just tie Management PF to specific device IDs where it's actually supported. I guess I can bring back a combination of the original patch and my fix to next cycle.