From: "Ramón Nordin Rodriguez" <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/net/phy: add driver for Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S PHY
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:08:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEE5XwqYrZfyhNXT@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b93039ef-a593-4acd-b9c1-3f3e6b79497d@lunn.ch>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06:16:05PM +0200, Ramón Nordin Rodriguez wrote:
> > Changes:
> > v2:
> > - Removed mentioning of not supporting auto-negotiation from commit
> > message
> > - Renamed file drivers/net/phy/lan867x.c ->
> > drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1s.c
> > - Renamed Kconfig option to reflect implementation filename (from
> > LAN867X_PHY to MICROCHIP_T1S_PHY)
> > - Moved entry in drivers/net/phy/KConfig to correct sort order
> > - Moved entry in drivers/net/phy/Makefile to correct sort order
> > - Moved variable declarations to conform to reverse christmas tree order
> > (in func lan867x_config_init)
> > - Moved register write to disable chip interrupts to func lan867x_config_init, when omitting the irq disable all togheter I got null pointer dereference, see the call trace below:
> >
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > phy_interrupt+0xa8/0xf0 [libphy]
> > irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x60
> > irq_thread+0xf7/0x1c0
> > ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10
> > ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10
> > kthread+0xe6/0x110
> > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
> > </TASK>
> >
> > - Removed func lan867x_config_interrupt and removed the member
> > .config_intr from the phy_driver struct
> >
> > v3:
> > - Indentation level in drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > - Moved const arrays into global scope and made them static in order to have
> > them placed in the .rodata section
> > - Renamed array variables, since they are no longer as closely scoped as
> > earlier
> > - Added comment about why phy_write_mmd is used over phy_modify_mmd
> > (this should have been addressed in the V2 change since it was brought
> > up in the V1 review)
> > - Return result of last call instead of saving it in a var and then
> > returning the var (in lan867x_config_init)
> >
> > Testing:
> > This has been tested with ethtool --set/get-plca-cfg and verified on an
> > oscilloscope where it was observed that:
> > - The PLCA beacon was enabled/disabled when setting the node-id to 0/not
> > 0
> > - The PLCA beacon is transmitted with the expected frequency when
> > changing max nodes
> > - Two devices using the evaluation board EVB-LAN8670-USB could ping each
> > other
> >
> >
> > This patch adds support for the Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S family
> > (LAN8670/1/2). The driver supports P2MP with PLCA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
>
> All the above ends up in the commit message, as you see in git log. So
> this last paragraph should really be first. As you have it, the
> history of the patch will also be included in the commit. Most Linux
> subsystems don't want that, although DaveM has argued it maybe should
> be in the commit message. But i personally think we have good archives
> of emails, and search engines for those archives, so i don't see the
> need.
>
The intention was not to include the history in the commit message, as
you allude to this was a misstake on my part.
> Anything you put after the --- will get discarded when the Maintainers
> perform the merge. So i suggest you move most of what you have in the
> commit message below the ---. You can also have two ---, which is how
> i tend to do it, so i can keep the history in my git repo, but it then
> gets removed when merged upstream.
I'll move the history to after the ---
>
> Additionally, you should add any Reviewed-by:, Acked-by: to your
> patches. Only discard them if you make major changed which invalidates
> any reviews.
>
> Andrew
I will post a V4 soon as the 24h window closes on V4, with
- history after the patch
- reviewers:
- Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
- Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Hoping this is the last of the newbie misstakes I've managed to pull
off.
Ramón
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-19 16:16 [PATCH v3] drivers/net/phy: add driver for Microchip LAN867x 10BASE-T1S PHY Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-04-20 12:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-04-20 13:08 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEE5XwqYrZfyhNXT@debian \
--to=ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.