All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled by default
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:24:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEF1MSwtSl7KdjMi@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh6tb7bsa.fsf@gitster.g>

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:22:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/config/feature.txt b/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> > index e52bc6b858..17b4d39f89 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> > @@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ feature.experimental::
> >  +
> >  * `fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=skipping` may improve fetch negotiation times by
> >  skipping more commits at a time, reducing the number of round trips.
> > -+
> > -* `gc.cruftPacks=true` reduces disk space used by unreachable objects during
> > -garbage collection, preventing loose object explosions.
>
> Being listed here is a definite sign that a feature behind a
> configuration variable is considered experimental.  Do we have (and
> if not, do we want to establish) a procedure to mark and announce a
> feature that used to be experimental no longer is?  If it is enough
> to mention it in the release notes, then I can take care of it, of
> course.

I am not aware of such a procedure. But personally I think it would be
fine to mention it in the release notes for the next release.

Thanks,
Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 20:54 [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:30   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:40     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 22:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-17 23:03     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:39       ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 14:54         ` Derrick Stolee
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:43   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:44     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:48   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:48     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:56   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:50     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-22 11:23       ` Jeff King
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:00   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:52     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:02   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 11:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:53   ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 16:31       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-20 16:57         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 17:24       ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2023-04-20 17:31         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 19:19           ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:41   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:19     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEF1MSwtSl7KdjMi@nand.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.