From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce NFTA_RULE_ACTUAL_EXPR
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:33:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEpdebCsg5JVYCU2@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZEpWIxsipUoH489w@calendula>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:01:55PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:58:44PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > [...]
> > > My proposal:
> >
> > Thanks for returning to this. Your approach requires to define a minimum
> > version from which on forward-compat is guaranteed. I was trying to
> > avoid this requirement though so things would work for "unknown user
> > space".
>
> You also require a kernel that supports your approach.
Sure. But in the described use-case, anything but old user space (i.e.,
container content) is under control.
> > Currently, the only offending extension is ebt_among since it doesn't
> > exist (and never did) in non-native form. If I implement among extension
> > parsing (even in non-functional form), my original approach would work.
> > This also means having a minimum version for full compat, but it affects
> > ebtables (actually, use of ebt_among) only.
>
> Yes, but this is fully user data, kernel really does not need to do
> anything with this alternative representation, which is what I do not
> like from you proposal.
OK.
> I really think userdata is the place to deal with this.
Having to touch old user space is not a good solution for the given
use-case. If kernel modification is a no-go, I'd rather introduce a
"compat mode" in iptables-nft which causes rule creation in the most
compatible form. This might impact run-time performance but is much
simpler to implement and maintain.
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-21 14:22 [nf-next PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce NFTA_RULE_ACTUAL_EXPR Phil Sutter
2023-01-12 10:15 ` Phil Sutter
2023-01-12 11:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-12 12:02 ` Phil Sutter
2023-01-18 11:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-18 13:48 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-02 21:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-03 13:48 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-03 15:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-03 16:21 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-04 9:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-04 21:00 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-06 9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-07 10:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-07 10:56 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-16 10:55 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-16 11:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-16 12:05 ` Phil Sutter
2023-04-26 19:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-27 10:57 ` Phil Sutter
2023-04-27 11:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-27 11:33 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2023-04-27 13:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-27 22:45 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEpdebCsg5JVYCU2@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.