From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 18:25:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEwBcOdV1br94T5N@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425222446.170486-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:24:43PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> If format changes are not /sys/** ABI violating, heres 3 minor ones:
>
> 1st strips "age <increasing>" from output. This makes the output
> idempotent; unchanging until a new leak is reported.
>
> 2nd adds the backtrace.checksum to the "backtrace:" line. This lets a
> user see repeats without actually reading the whole backtrace. So now
> the backtrace line looks like this:
>
> backtrace (ck 603070071): # also see below
>
> Q: should ck be spelled crc ? it feels more communicative.
These all would make sense (and 'crc' sounds better) if they were done
from the start. I know there are test scripts out there parsing the
kmemleak sysfs file. I can't tell whether these changes would break
them.
Cc'ing Dmitry, I think syzbot was regularly checking kmemleak (not sure
it still does).
> NB: with ck exposed, it becomes possible to do a "selective clear",
> something like:
>
> echo drop 603070071 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>
> The 3rd patch takes __init off of kmemleak_test_init(). This fixes a
> bare-pointer in the 2nd line of the backtrace below, which previously
> looked like:
>
> [<00000000ef738764>] 0xffffffffc02350a2
>
> NB: this happens still/again, after rmmod kmemleak-test.
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff888005d9ca40 (size 32):
> comm "modprobe", pid 412, jiffies 4294703300
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 cd d9 05 80 88 ff ff 40 cf d9 05 80 88 ff ff ........@.......
> 14 a7 c4 f6 7d f9 87 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....}...........
> backtrace (ck 1354775490):
> [<000000002c474f61>] kmalloc_trace+0x26/0x90
> [<00000000b26599c1>] kmemleak_test_init+0x58/0x2d0 [kmemleak_test]
> [<0000000044d13990>] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x210
> [<00000000131bc505>] do_init_module+0x4a/0x210
> [<00000000b2902890>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x93/0xf0
> [<00000000673fdce2>] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
> [<00000000357a2d80>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-28 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 22:24 [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kmemleak: drop (age <increasing>) from leak record Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] kmemleak: add checksum to backtrace report Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] kmemleak-test: drop __init to get better backtrace Jim Cromie
2023-04-28 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-28 17:25 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-11-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes jim.cromie
2023-11-16 17:56 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEwBcOdV1br94T5N@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.