Re: [RFC 06/11] Documentation/hwmon: Revise patch submission checklist

[Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2293 bytes --]

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:57:47AM -0700, James Seo wrote:
> -* Only the following I2C addresses shall be probed: 0x18-0x1f, 0x28-0x2f,
> -  0x48-0x4f, 0x58, 0x5c, 0x73 and 0x77. Probing other addresses is strongly
> -  discouraged as it is known to cause trouble with other (non-hwmon) I2C
> -  chips. If your chip lives at an address which can't be probed then the
> -  device will have to be instantiated explicitly (which is always better
> -  anyway.)
> +* Only the following I2C addresses shall be probed: ``0x18``-``0x1f``,
> +  ``0x28``-``0x2f``, ``0x48``-``0x4f``, ``0x58``, ``0x5c``, ``0x73``,
> +  and ``0x77``. Probing other addresses is strongly discouraged, as it is
> +  known to cause trouble with other (non-``hwmon``) I2C chips. If your chip
> +  lives at an address which can't be probed, then the device will have to be
> +  instantiated explicitly (which is always better anyway).

IMO hwmon here refers to the subsystem (not code identifier name), so
inlining here isn't needed.

>  * Make sure there are no race conditions in the probe function. Specifically,
>    completely initialize your chip and your driver first, then register with
> -  the hwmon subsystem.
> +  the ``hwmon`` subsystem.

Also here.

>  
> -* Use devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info() or, if your driver needs a remove
> -  function, hwmon_device_register_with_info() to register your driver with the
> -  hwmon subsystem. Try using devm_add_action() instead of a remove function if
> -  possible. Do not use any of the deprecated registration functions.
> +* Use
> +  :ref:`devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info() <devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info>`
> +  or, if your driver needs a remove function,
> +  :ref:`hwmon_device_register_with_info() <hwmon_device_register_with_info>` to
> +  register your driver with the ``hwmon`` subsystem. Try using devm_add_action()
> +  instead of a remove function if possible. Do not use any of the deprecated
> +  registration functions.

And here.

> -* Do not provide support for deprecated sysfs attributes.
> +* Do not provide support for deprecated ``sysfs`` attributes.

Dunno if sysfs (as subsystem name) also needs to be inlined.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]