From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A7CC7EE23 for ; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwlUK-0001H9-Am; Wed, 10 May 2023 11:12:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwlU4-0000Qa-Ji for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2023 11:12:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwlU1-0002mc-Dz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2023 11:12:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683731519; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=eg6IsxRxNubXq4SgsSYoimmOEyjTQG9TwBCk+NcRFpg=; b=LwPA2ATlqb/6/+9Pm/4cq4lG7mXqx9EQIa7U4R8x5bc7HqJT7iDCywa21GsrrahAfh/6Xc +s/FTtZpVKmTPTQvDj9PKsHYjjkxOnToO8mQ5B0RC4gYpdtIfuAkUp6o9605bwyH6ZmpFE r8rlmageslWio9UYGxN0aJxIPstBl0I= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-215-yaKGY1FTMreMUT3J09esWw-1; Wed, 10 May 2023 11:11:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yaKGY1FTMreMUT3J09esWw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843513813F39; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED454078907; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:11:50 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kyle Evans , Warner Losh , Laurent Vivier , Christian Borntraeger , Peter Maydell , Markus Armbruster , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Getting rid of "uint" and friends Message-ID: References: <20230510143925.4094-1-quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230510143925.4094-1-quintela@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > It cames from (this is Fedora38 x86_64, but I guess modern linux are similar): > > /usr/include/system/types.h > > ... > > /* Old compatibility names for C types. */ > typedef unsigned long int ulong; > typedef unsigned short int ushort; > typedef unsigned int uint; > > So I decided to get rid of them. And searching through the tree I found: > - that I had already have had this problem in the past snip > (*): No, I have no clue either why/where/how __USE_MISC got defined. It is a result of _GNU_SOURCE=1, which activates more or less "everything" that GLibC exposes With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|