From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C42EC77B75 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2139810E35A; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2AFC10E35A for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:23:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1684768993; x=1716304993; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hd4hfRikelssu/30s8T3U2uG6qEBdskpgkRKfggiUBQ=; b=RODZGAZr+cWQWNeOuu5q42QUWxbq4vq+wPA1+QE0VX6t6FuevreO386Z kgRdz1hhZnwCbnfEm8Kgijmj8Aoy5WArf75tWK2Ik54oald4+o21iQFrN GH1kI069/NC1E4YyUSg16F7t0AQ/oNnwK+PdjXPcOu3EATvpnDZJlS9Aj er1gIljnXQl88HmoLBg0Pw/UCfPfwZxsb3Cr1SrvvI9p8U1hLxVn+i3pL d53vEM9LNtuTD0JVG7RER0Nh1fxtNnUg8oS6aqgfsX0ZwBp1eVQFHBlG0 aDWvZCeHx6jql/tbr3DTUGZ+I6L4hDG/39s9K39CI1wFFJmaFyitFmIo8 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10718"; a="381182344" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,184,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="381182344" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2023 08:23:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10718"; a="734304527" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,184,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="734304527" Received: from unknown (HELO intel.com) ([10.237.72.65]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2023 08:23:08 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 18:23:05 +0300 From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" To: Vinod Govindapillai Message-ID: References: <20230511231750.313467-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> <20230511231750.313467-5-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230511231750.313467-5-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/8] drm/i915: extract intel_bw_check_qgv_points() X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@intel.com Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:17:46AM +0300, Vinod Govindapillai wrote: > Extract intel_bw_check_qgv_points() from intel_bw_atomic_check > to facilitate future platform variations in handling SAGV > configurations. > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 235 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > index db117638d23b..d83aafd0cc2b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > @@ -803,6 +803,128 @@ intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state); > } > > +static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > + unsigned int data_rate, > + unsigned int num_active_planes, > + const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state, > + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state) > +{ > + unsigned int max_bw_point = 0; > + unsigned int max_bw = 0; > + unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points; > + unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points; > + u16 psf_points = 0; > + u16 qgv_points = 0; > + int i; > + int ret; > + > + ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) { > + unsigned int max_data_rate; > + > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) > 11) > + max_data_rate = tgl_max_bw(i915, num_active_planes, i); > + else > + max_data_rate = icl_max_bw(i915, num_active_planes, i); > + /* > + * We need to know which qgv point gives us > + * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV > + * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time > + * with watermarks. By that moment we already > + * have those, as it is calculated earlier in > + * intel_atomic_check, > + */ > + if (max_data_rate > max_bw) { > + max_bw_point = i; > + max_bw = max_data_rate; > + } > + if (max_data_rate >= data_rate) > + qgv_points |= BIT(i); > + > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "QGV point %d: max bw %d required %d\n", > + i, max_data_rate, data_rate); > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_psf_gv_points; i++) { > + unsigned int max_data_rate = adl_psf_bw(i915, i); > + > + if (max_data_rate >= data_rate) > + psf_points |= BIT(i); > + > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "PSF GV point %d: max bw %d" > + " required %d\n", > + i, max_data_rate, data_rate); > + } > + > + /* > + * BSpec states that we always should have at least one allowed point > + * left, so if we couldn't - simply reject the configuration for obvious > + * reasons. > + */ > + if (qgv_points == 0) { > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No QGV points provide sufficient memory" > + " bandwidth %d for display configuration(%d active planes).\n", > + data_rate, num_active_planes); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (num_psf_gv_points > 0 && psf_points == 0) { > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No PSF GV points provide sufficient memory" > + " bandwidth %d for display configuration(%d active planes).\n", > + data_rate, num_active_planes); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* > + * Leave only single point with highest bandwidth, if > + * we can't enable SAGV due to the increased memory latency it may > + * cause. > + */ > + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state)) { > + qgv_points = BIT(max_bw_point); > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n", > + max_bw_point); > + } > + > + /* > + * We store the ones which need to be masked as that is what PCode > + * actually accepts as a parameter. > + */ > + new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask = > + ~(ICL_PCODE_REQ_QGV_PT(qgv_points) | > + ADLS_PCODE_REQ_PSF_PT(psf_points)) & > + icl_qgv_points_mask(i915); > + > + /* > + * If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that > + * the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset, nonblocking) > + */ > + if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask != old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask) { > + ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int intel_bw_check_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > + const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state, > + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state) > +{ > + unsigned int data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(i915, new_bw_state); > + unsigned int num_active_planes = > + intel_bw_num_active_planes(i915, new_bw_state); > + > + data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000); > + > + return icl_find_qgv_points(i915, data_rate, num_active_planes, > + old_bw_state, new_bw_state); > +} > + > static bool intel_bw_state_changed(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state, > const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state) > @@ -1049,20 +1171,14 @@ static int intel_bw_check_data_rate(struct intel_atomic_state *state, bool *chan > > int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > { > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev); > - const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state; > - struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state; > - unsigned int data_rate; > - unsigned int num_active_planes; > - int i, ret; > - u16 qgv_points = 0, psf_points = 0; > - unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0; > - unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points; > - unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = dev_priv->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points; > bool changed = false; > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev); > + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state; > + const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state; > + int ret; > > /* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */ > - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11) > return 0; > > ret = intel_bw_check_data_rate(state, &changed); > @@ -1073,8 +1189,8 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state); > > if (new_bw_state && > - intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, old_bw_state) != > - intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) > + intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, old_bw_state) != > + intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state)) > changed = true; > > /* > @@ -1084,101 +1200,10 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > if (!changed) > return 0; > > - ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base); > + ret = intel_bw_check_qgv_points(i915, old_bw_state, new_bw_state); > if (ret) > return ret; > > - data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, new_bw_state); > - data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate, 1000); > - > - num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, new_bw_state); > - > - for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) { > - unsigned int max_data_rate; > - > - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 11) > - max_data_rate = tgl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_active_planes, i); > - else > - max_data_rate = icl_max_bw(dev_priv, num_active_planes, i); > - /* > - * We need to know which qgv point gives us > - * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV > - * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time > - * with watermarks. By that moment we already > - * have those, as it is calculated earlier in > - * intel_atomic_check, > - */ > - if (max_data_rate > max_bw) { > - max_bw_point = i; > - max_bw = max_data_rate; > - } > - if (max_data_rate >= data_rate) > - qgv_points |= BIT(i); > - > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "QGV point %d: max bw %d required %d\n", > - i, max_data_rate, data_rate); > - } > - > - for (i = 0; i < num_psf_gv_points; i++) { > - unsigned int max_data_rate = adl_psf_bw(dev_priv, i); > - > - if (max_data_rate >= data_rate) > - psf_points |= BIT(i); > - > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSF GV point %d: max bw %d" > - " required %d\n", > - i, max_data_rate, data_rate); > - } > - > - /* > - * BSpec states that we always should have at least one allowed point > - * left, so if we couldn't - simply reject the configuration for obvious > - * reasons. > - */ > - if (qgv_points == 0) { > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No QGV points provide sufficient memory" > - " bandwidth %d for display configuration(%d active planes).\n", > - data_rate, num_active_planes); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > - if (num_psf_gv_points > 0 && psf_points == 0) { > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No PSF GV points provide sufficient memory" > - " bandwidth %d for display configuration(%d active planes).\n", > - data_rate, num_active_planes); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > - /* > - * Leave only single point with highest bandwidth, if > - * we can't enable SAGV due to the increased memory latency it may > - * cause. > - */ > - if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) { > - qgv_points = BIT(max_bw_point); > - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n", > - max_bw_point); > - } > - > - /* > - * We store the ones which need to be masked as that is what PCode > - * actually accepts as a parameter. > - */ > - new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask = > - ~(ICL_PCODE_REQ_QGV_PT(qgv_points) | > - ADLS_PCODE_REQ_PSF_PT(psf_points)) & > - icl_qgv_points_mask(dev_priv); > - > - /* > - * If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that > - * the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset, nonblocking) > - */ > - if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask != old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask) { > - ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - } > - > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.34.1 >