From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Yi Liu" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHES 00/17] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:12:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHbJR2wrRarW90Jy@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac924372-210c-155e-9aeb-36218d35444e@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:10:15AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> I agree with you that the existing IOPF framework is not ideal for
> IOMMUFD. The adding ASYNC flag conflicts with the IOPF workqueue.
> This could lead to performance issues.
>
> I can improve the IOPF framework to make it more friendly to IOMMUFD.
> One way to do this would be not use workqueue for the IOMMUFD case.
>
> Have I covered all your concerns?
Yea. My concern was mainly at the fault report for non-PRI cases.
Though I am still on the fence about using IOPF framework, let's
see first how the improved design would look like.
Thanks
Nic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-30 5:37 [RFC PATCHES 00/17] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 01/17] iommu: Move iommu fault data to linux/iommu.h Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 02/17] iommu: Support asynchronous I/O page fault response Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 03/17] iommu: Add helper to set iopf handler for domain Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 04/17] iommu: Pass device parameter to iopf handler Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 05/17] iommu: Split IO page fault handling from SVA Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 06/17] iommu: Add iommu page fault cookie helpers Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 07/17] iommufd: Add iommu page fault data Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 08/17] iommufd: IO page fault delivery initialization and release Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 09/17] iommufd: Add iommufd hwpt iopf handler Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 10/17] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_FLAGS_USER_PASID_TABLE for hwpt_alloc Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 11/17] iommufd: Deliver fault messages to user space Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 12/17] iommufd: Add io page fault response support Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 13/17] iommufd: Add a timer for each iommufd fault data Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 14/17] iommufd: Drain all pending faults when destroying hwpt Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 15/17] iommufd: Allow new hwpt_alloc flags Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 16/17] iommufd/selftest: Add IOPF feature for mock devices Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 5:37 ` [RFC PATCHES 17/17] iommufd/selftest: Cover iopf-capable nested hwpt Lu Baolu
2023-05-30 18:50 ` [RFC PATCHES 00/17] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space Nicolin Chen
2023-05-31 2:10 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-31 4:12 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2023-06-25 6:30 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-25 19:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-06-26 3:10 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-26 18:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-06-26 18:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-26 18:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-28 2:00 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-28 12:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-28 12:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-29 1:07 ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-31 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31 3:17 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-23 6:18 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-23 13:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 13:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-16 11:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-06-16 11:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-06-19 3:35 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-26 9:51 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-06-26 9:51 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-06-19 12:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-19 12:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHbJR2wrRarW90Jy@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.