All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] tests/qtest: make more migration pre-copy scenarios run non-live
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:17:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHjEh5GSgS+3i8HQ@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c02b1c2-1636-24d9-8466-3bcc6c88acbd@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:09:44PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/06/2023 14.33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> ...
> > > On a test machine this reduces execution time from 13 minutes to
> > > 8 minutes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I have a different idea to get the migration tests faster.  Namely, just
> > stop letting enter the completation stage until we are ready to use it.
> > 
> > I need that functionality also for vfio migration, so as I have to
> > create the patches, can we put on hold the last two patches and give me
> > a couple of days?
> 
> A couple of days are certainly OK ... but could we please avoid being stuck
> in the current situation for many more weeks?

Also as I mentioned in my reply to Peter, I'm wary of an approach that
puts in a synchronization between the test suite and the migrate code,
because that's making migration run in a manner which doesn't actually
match how it'll run in the real world. So I think if there was a feature
to add a sync before the final iteration, we'd still want to test without
using that feature so we get proper coverage.

Could we merge this series as-is, and simply re-visit the last patch
afterwards, once we have time to debate the feature about completion
phase synchronization.

>                                               The slowness of the migration
> tests are really slowing down my turnaround times, and I think they
> contribute to the timeouts of the Travis CI tests that I'm currently facing,
> and likely also contributed to the issue that the QEMU project ran out of
> Gitlab CI minutes again last month (which is thankfully mostly hidden by the
> new private Linux runners, but some things like the Windows runners were not
> available anymore). So I'd appreciate if we'd rather get a speed up here
> merged rather sooner than later.
> 
> > Thomas, do you care if I get the whole sets of patches through the
> > migration tree?
> 
> That's fine, please take them through your tree!

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31 13:23 [PATCH v3 0/9] tests/qtest: make migration-test massively faster Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] tests/qtest: add various qtest_qmp_assert_success() variants Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:23   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:48     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:04   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:20   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:51     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] tests/qtest: add support for callback to receive QMP events Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 14:57   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:14   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:56     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] tests/qtest: get rid of 'qmp_command' helper in migration test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:26   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01  9:32     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:17   ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] tests/qtest: get rid of some 'qtest_qmp' usage " Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:28   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:10   ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] tests/qtest: switch to using event callbacks for STOP event Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:31   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:23   ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] tests/qtest: replace wait_command() with qtest_qmp_assert_success Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:37   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:27   ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] tests/qtest: capture RESUME events during migration Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:38   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:31   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:34     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:37       ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:44         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] tests/qtest: make more migration pre-copy scenarios run non-live Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01  9:47   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:33   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:38     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:09     ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:17       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-06-01 16:26         ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:30   ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:39     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 15:53       ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:55         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:17           ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:35             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:59               ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 22:58             ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 22:55           ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] tests/qtest: massively speed up migration-test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 10:04   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 15:46   ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:05     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:22       ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:36         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 17:04           ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 23:00     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 23:43       ` Peter Xu
2023-07-10  9:35         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-07-10  9:40           ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZHjEh5GSgS+3i8HQ@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.