From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:19:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y7sflqb.fsf@secure.mitica>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:33:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Only "defer" is recommended. After setting all migation parameters,
> >> start incoming migration with "migrate-incoming uri" command.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 7 +++++++
> >> softmmu/vl.c | 2 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> index 47e98dc95e..518672722d 100644
> >> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> @@ -447,3 +447,10 @@ The new way to modify migration is using migration parameters.
> >> ``blk`` functionality can be acchieved using
> >> ``migrate_set_parameter block-incremental true``.
> >>
> >> +``-incoming uri`` (since 8.1)
> >> +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> >> +
> >> +Everything except ``-incoming defer`` are deprecated. This allows to
> >> +setup parameters before launching the proper migration with
> >> +``migrate-incoming uri``.
> >> +
> >> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> index b0b96f67fa..7fe865ab59 100644
> >> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> >> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> @@ -2651,6 +2651,8 @@ void qmp_x_exit_preconfig(Error **errp)
> >> if (incoming) {
> >> Error *local_err = NULL;
> >> if (strcmp(incoming, "defer") != 0) {
> >> + warn_report("-incoming %s is deprecated, use -incoming defer and "
> >> + " set the uri with migrate-incoming.", incoming);
> >
> > I still use uri for all my scripts, alongside with "-global migration.xxx"
> > and it works.
>
> You know what you are doing (TM).
> And remember that we don't support -gobal migration.x-foo.
> Yes, I know, we should drop the "x-" prefixes.
I hope they'll always be there. :) They're pretty handy for tests, when we
want to boot a VM without the need to script the sequences of qmp cmds.
Yes, we probably should just always drop the x-. We can always declare
debugging purpose for all -global migration.* fields.
>
> > Shall we just leave it there? Or is deprecating it helps us in any form?
>
> See the patches two weeks ago when people complained that lisen(.., num)
> was too low. And there are other parameters that work the same way
> (that I convenientely had forgotten). So the easiest way to get things
> right is to use "defer" always. Using -incoming "uri" should only be
> for people that "know what they are doing", so we had to ways to do it:
> - review all migration options and see which ones work without defer
> and document it
> - deprecate everything that is not defer.
>
> Anything else is not going to be very user unfriendly.
> What do you think.
IIRC Wei Wang had a series just for that, so after that patchset applied we
should have fixed all issues cleanly? Is there one more thing that's not
working right there?
>
> Later, Juan.
>
> PD. This series are RFC for multiple reasons O:-)
Happy to know the rest (besides which I know will break my script :).
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 19:33 [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 1/6] migration: skipped field is really obsolete Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 17:49 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 2/6] migration: migrate 'inc' command option is deprecated Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 3/6] migration: migrate 'blk' " Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri> Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:41 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-12 20:51 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 21:19 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-06-20 12:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:34 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-20 14:45 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 8:52 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 19:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 10:01 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 9:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 15:54 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:20 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 7:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:34 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 8:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:51 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 15:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-21 7:08 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 2:22 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 5/6] migration: Deprecate block migration Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 11:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-06-22 18:17 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 6/6] migration: Deprecated old compression method Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 7:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 19:21 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:32 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-13 7:48 ` [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Jiri Denemark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.