All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: fix sparse warning about __user access
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 08:43:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJL+edmv267MHhdQ@jerom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRz0Y_D1Q=8xPKVJemYf=KUziC9s1TUJ86F+Lw+OrXdVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 05:47:54PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 1:57 PM Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 01:35:35PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > The two syscalls for capget and capset are producing sparse warnings
> > > as sparse is thinking that the "struct __user_cap_data_struct" is marked
> > > user, which seems to be down to the declaration and typedef at the same
> > > time.
> > >
> > > Fix the following warnings by splutting the struct declaration and then
> > > the user typedef into two:
> >
> > I'm not a fan of making code changes to work around scanners'
> > shortcomings, mainly because eventually I assume the scanners
> > will learn to deal with it.
> >
> > However, I don't like the all-in-one typedef+struct definition
> > either, so let's go with it :)
> >
> > Paul, do you mind picking this up?
> 
> Sure, no problem.  Since we are at -rc7, I'm assuming this can wait
> until after the merge window?

Yeah, it's just fixing a sparse warning, no urgency.

thanks,
-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-21 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 12:35 [PATCH] capabilities: fix sparse warning about __user access Ben Dooks
2023-06-19 17:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2023-06-19 21:47   ` Paul Moore
2023-06-21 13:43     ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2023-07-05 22:46       ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZJL+edmv267MHhdQ@jerom \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.