From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
leit@fb.com,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Break down mitigations configurations
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:52:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJN/SGwvOBZmChJw@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9bc78ed-1f05-47db-e916-d4d8bc76634e@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:35:45PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/21/23 12:41, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > Yes, a single series (or a patch) that adds config for each mitigation
> > would be good.
>
> Do people _really_ want per-mitigation compile-time controls? That
> seems like kinda a pain.
>
> I Boris suggested it, but it seems like a _bit_ of overkill to me.
>
> Would a compile-time option that just defaulted _everything_ to
> mitigations=off behavior work instead? That way we don't end up with a
> billion new config options.
This is exactly what my original patch proposed. It solves the problem with
a few lines of changes.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230203120615.1121272-1-leitao@debian.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-16 16:48 [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Break down mitigations configurations Breno Leitao
2023-06-21 0:13 ` Pawan Gupta
2023-06-21 15:54 ` Breno Leitao
2023-06-21 17:31 ` Pawan Gupta
2023-06-21 18:36 ` Breno Leitao
2023-06-21 19:41 ` Pawan Gupta
2023-06-21 22:35 ` Dave Hansen
2023-06-21 22:52 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2023-06-21 22:58 ` Dave Hansen
2023-06-22 12:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-06-22 13:42 ` Dave Hansen
2023-06-27 17:36 ` Breno Leitao
2023-06-27 22:30 ` Pawan Gupta
2023-06-28 9:15 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJN/SGwvOBZmChJw@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=leit@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.