From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com (mail-pf1-f173.google.com [209.85.210.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DF410F9 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6686708c986so4285499b3a.0 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:09:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687864176; x=1690456176; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yCulnbK4UVAIuU+v53/85jZk8IWMeCcaI0WY2liGvPA=; b=nSQteyETBd9yYULRPcFvNVoWbGBsOC1cYjSgFH79kRXvgn8SuXMXSLEM783VzwITKB VoFg6CyUBRVuT1/iAjMetGHHakjnd2YetrF2bSGQlo9FpvLJzBDZEsDwIl0EIgngmxQf 6OPHOUwjRgKQ6TsA7ge2uTny30tJZt/NaO6ePUFxhClwiDqZ044/hmYwOgCIlzFthWin jgqetGWFzxVerwt6HsL4QWiL2VcZLu/RVbFGnlDGg8oLrAIyxUeVAFkJx5fHOaaxHhEK sImVyu1YN56Zp7/CQpBf8gKz8G1OssLYZji7FWyuLpT54c+N1M/bzElxHzrtXCmX1xrF sEaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687864176; x=1690456176; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yCulnbK4UVAIuU+v53/85jZk8IWMeCcaI0WY2liGvPA=; b=WLPpkqC51SeLx4SP1GcnmO7Fn9RUhRChNsKtfNKxRhBVwpS8HbFqldhBiCx/YQ1Nbz N32QjWtUs0TiXSr8t2kg/2oA9F0HxSZTbQ7GzNIBh6jiY+eVu2vmDS2EGLO5Rbez/Mqj ZAyaDTlh54HKElGCBspMjNNnqGCTTHjhCGbzzF7Nq5gyf14MfPhq1/kFASut+qIsS5Si eA19ihhz8FtMesCJvSj5zdDqaQbODkeJQwXfraewZo1/ap7jKNDXpDFWmFZZ7mGUiVgf U21OEi93tEGo1qrQuwytqPdEo9x/XKVdZ+hJev2ljoCGjtT63pvJhdqm2DAP28DDn7nY PF9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxUEg2JVdhV1Q3F84Mxy+o9X6V3oDihm6bz2DaLTmQR5tzwwvCi naRuw2vsk+9B8f6267c75I8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7ynXpmy/G7SQYOF7SfsDAUzc6i/E7PnJ8qJA5IV2IA2fH9QwY4t2g4wMq7KeuEXN7eqFZBVA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3d81:b0:107:35ed:28a7 with SMTP id s1-20020a056a203d8100b0010735ed28a7mr41063430pzi.8.1687864176251; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.me ([103.131.18.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jj15-20020a170903048f00b001b7fc5eee0esm3995591plb.197.2023.06.27.04.09.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by debian.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C38B81BD58A; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:09:31 +0700 (WIB) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:09:31 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: "Caleb D.S. Brzezinski" , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ks7010: Wrap macro definitions in parenthesis Message-ID: References: <20210616212552.117604-1-calebdsb@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b/EBRw95GKhbiUfN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210616212552.117604-1-calebdsb@protonmail.com> --b/EBRw95GKhbiUfN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:26:03PM +0000, Caleb D.S. Brzezinski wrote: > /* 11b rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_1M (u8)(10 / 5) /* 11b 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_2M (u8)(20 / 5) /* 11b 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_5M (u8)(55 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_11M (u8)(110 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_1M ((u8)(10 / 5)) /* 11b 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_2M ((u8)(20 / 5)) /* 11b 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_5M ((u8)(55 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_11M ((u8)(110 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */ > =20 > /* 11g rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_6M (u8)(60 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_12M (u8)(120 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_24M (u8)(240 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */ > -#define TX_RATE_9M (u8)(90 / 5) > -#define TX_RATE_18M (u8)(180 / 5) > -#define TX_RATE_36M (u8)(360 / 5) > -#define TX_RATE_48M (u8)(480 / 5) > -#define TX_RATE_54M (u8)(540 / 5) > +#define TX_RATE_6M ((u8)(60 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_12M ((u8)(120 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_24M ((u8)(240 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */ > +#define TX_RATE_9M ((u8)(90 / 5)) > +#define TX_RATE_18M ((u8)(180 / 5)) > +#define TX_RATE_36M ((u8)(360 / 5)) > +#define TX_RATE_48M ((u8)(480 / 5)) > +#define TX_RATE_54M ((u8)(540 / 5)) > =20 tl;dr (quoted from Greg's bot): > You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past few > days, and is identical to ones that has been recently rejected. > Please always look at the mailing list traffic to determine if you are > duplicating other people's work. Why? See discussions on [1] and [2]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YCUAy1VhLV3lwa3H@kroah.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210222062849.GN2087@kadam/ Thanks. --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --b/EBRw95GKhbiUfN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZJrDZwAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o4o+AP4kFJ0bFcTyIOndwfy4gS/8SGA/DJBOq0/mYtL9Wd5AVQEA7BP+wLRB5cFA /G6ufCcKDnBj7clg9tHBRB0Rb9QPJQg= =mNiQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b/EBRw95GKhbiUfN--