From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] netfilter: conntrack: validate cta_ip via parsing
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZK6nwn99T8NAP6pC@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711032257.3561166-1-linma@zju.edu.cn>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:22:57AM +0800, Lin Ma wrote:
> In current ctnetlink_parse_tuple_ip() function, nested parsing and
> validation is splitting as two parts. This is unnecessary as the
> nla_parse_nested_deprecated function supports validation in the fly.
> These two finially reach same place __nla_validate_parse with same
> validate flag.
>
> nla_parse_nested_deprecated
> __nla_parse(.., NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL, ..)
> __nla_validate_parse
>
> nla_validate_nested_deprecated
> __nla_validate_nested(.., NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL, ..)
> __nla_validate
> __nla_validate_parse
>
> This commit removes the call to nla_validate_nested_deprecated and pass
> cta_ip_nla_policy when do parsing.
>
> Fixes: 8cb081746c03 ("netlink: make validation more configurable for future strictness")
I don't think this warrants a fixes tag, as it's not fixing any
user-visible behaviour. Rather, it is a clean-up.
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> index 69c8c8c7e9b8..334db22199c1 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> @@ -1321,15 +1321,11 @@ static int ctnetlink_parse_tuple_ip(struct nlattr *attr,
> struct nlattr *tb[CTA_IP_MAX+1];
> int ret = 0;
>
> - ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, CTA_IP_MAX, attr, NULL, NULL);
> + ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, CTA_IP_MAX, attr,
> + cta_ip_nla_policy, NULL);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = nla_validate_nested_deprecated(attr, CTA_IP_MAX,
> - cta_ip_nla_policy, NULL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
> case NFPROTO_IPV4:
> ret = ipv4_nlattr_to_tuple(tb, tuple, flags);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 3:22 [PATCH v1] netfilter: conntrack: validate cta_ip via parsing Lin Ma
2023-07-12 13:16 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-07-12 13:26 ` Lin Ma
2023-07-13 8:52 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZK6nwn99T8NAP6pC@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linma@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.