From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xe_vm: Unmap BOs in bind queue independent test
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:32:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLAZJecArErz6wRf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710145856.1864141-4-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Exercises the maple tree dep tracker logic.
could you please add a bit more of explanation here on how this
is achieving the objective?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/xe/xe_vm.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 5fd511f0b..36cd80357 100644
> --- a/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/tests/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -811,6 +811,12 @@ test_bind_engines_independent(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
> NULL));
> igt_assert_eq(data[0].data, 0xc0ffee);
>
> + syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
> + sync[0].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> + sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
> + xe_vm_unbind_all_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, sync, 1);
> + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
should we have an extra flag for this? no risk to the existent tests?
> +
> syncobj_destroy(fd, sync[0].handle);
> for (i = 0; i < N_ENGINES; i++) {
> syncobj_destroy(fd, syncobjs[i]);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 14:58 [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] xe/xe_exec_basic: A sections to test NULL (sparse) bindings Matthew Brost
2023-07-10 14:58 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/5] xe_vm: MMAP style VM binds section Matthew Brost
2023-07-13 15:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-14 4:13 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-10 14:58 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 3/5] xe_vm: Add mmap / munmap sections that split large pages Matthew Brost
2023-07-13 15:30 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-14 4:11 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-10 14:58 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xe_vm: Unmap BOs in bind queue independent test Matthew Brost
2023-07-13 15:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-07-14 4:08 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-10 14:58 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 5/5] xe_vm: add bind engine conflict section Matthew Brost
2023-07-13 15:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-10 16:09 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] xe/xe_exec_basic: A sections to test NULL (sparse) bindings Patchwork
2023-07-10 16:46 ` [igt-dev] ○ CI.xeBAT: info " Patchwork
2023-07-13 15:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-14 18:00 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-14 18:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-21 4:37 Matthew Brost
2023-07-21 4:37 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xe_vm: Unmap BOs in bind queue independent test Matthew Brost
2023-07-21 20:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLAZJecArErz6wRf@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.