From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:14:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMGaqsDTe4oDCdAZ@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726102603.155522-6-hao.xu@linux.dev>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:26:01PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
>
> Add llseek_nowait() operation for xfs, it acts just like llseek(). The
> thing different is it delivers nowait parameter to iomap layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 73adc0aee2ff..cba82264221d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1257,10 +1257,11 @@ xfs_file_readdir(
> }
>
> STATIC loff_t
> -xfs_file_llseek(
> +__xfs_file_llseek(
> struct file *file,
> loff_t offset,
> - int whence)
> + int whence,
> + bool nowait)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>
> @@ -1282,6 +1283,28 @@ xfs_file_llseek(
> return vfs_setpos(file, offset, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
> }
>
> +STATIC loff_t
> +xfs_file_llseek(
> + struct file *file,
> + loff_t offset,
> + int whence)
> +{
> + return __xfs_file_llseek(file, offset, whence, false);
> +}
> +
> +STATIC loff_t
> +xfs_file_llseek_nowait(
> + struct file *file,
> + loff_t offset,
> + int whence,
> + bool nowait)
> +{
> + if (file->f_op == &xfs_file_operations)
> + return __xfs_file_llseek(file, offset, whence, nowait);
> + else
> + return generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
> static inline vm_fault_t
> xfs_dax_fault(
> @@ -1442,6 +1465,7 @@ xfs_file_mmap(
>
> const struct file_operations xfs_file_operations = {
> .llseek = xfs_file_llseek,
> + .llseek_nowait = xfs_file_llseek_nowait,
> .read_iter = xfs_file_read_iter,
> .write_iter = xfs_file_write_iter,
> .splice_read = xfs_file_splice_read,
> @@ -1467,6 +1491,7 @@ const struct file_operations xfs_dir_file_operations = {
> .read = generic_read_dir,
> .iterate_shared = xfs_file_readdir,
> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> + .llseek_nowait = xfs_file_llseek_nowait,
> .unlocked_ioctl = xfs_file_ioctl,
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> .compat_ioctl = xfs_file_compat_ioctl,
This is pretty nasty. It would be far better just to change the
.llseek method than to inflict this on every filesystem for the
forseeable future.
Not that I'm a fan of passing "nowait" booleans all through the file
operations methods - that way lies madness. We use a control
structure for the IO path operations (kiocb) to hold per-call
context information, perhaps we need something similar for these
other methods that people are wanting to hook up to io_uring (e.g.
readdir) so taht we don't have to play whack-a-mole with every new
io_uring method that people want and then end up with a different
nowait solution for every method.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 10:25 [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: merge iomap_seek_hole() and iomap_seek_data() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:10 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: add nowait support for xfs_seek_iomap_begin() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27 12:17 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] add nowait parameter for iomap_seek() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] add llseek_nowait() for struct file_operations Hao Xu
2023-07-27 13:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-07-27 12:26 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] add vfs_lseek_nowait() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] add lseek for io_uring Hao Xu
2023-07-26 13:22 ` [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 12:30 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMGaqsDTe4oDCdAZ@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bugs@claycon.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.xu@linux.dev \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.