From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Restore efficient freq earlier
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:36:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMPgfvUneE1RjROi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726010044.3280402-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:00:44PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
> When we disable the "Ignore efficient frequency" flag, GuC does not
> actually bring the requested freq down to RPn.
>
> Specifically, this scenario-
>
> - ignore efficient freq set to true
> - reduce min to RPn (from efficient)
> - suspend
> - resume (includes GuC load, restore soft min/max, restore efficient freq)
> - validate min freq has been resored to RPn
>
> This will fail if we didn't first restore(disable, in this case) efficient
> freq flag before setting the soft min frequency.
>
> v2: Bring the min freq down to RPn when we disable efficient freq (Rodrigo)
> Also made the change to set the min softlimit to RPn at init. Otherwise, we
> were storing RPe there.
Thanks
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8736
> Fixes: 55f9720dbf23 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Provide sysfs for efficient freq")
> Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency")
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index ee9f83af7cf6..477df260ae3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -470,12 +470,19 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool val)
> ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
> SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY,
> val);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> guc_probe_error(slpc_to_guc(slpc), "Failed to set efficient freq(%d): %pe\n",
> val, ERR_PTR(ret));
> - else
> + } else {
> slpc->ignore_eff_freq = val;
>
> + /* Set min to RPn when we disable efficient freq */
> + if (val)
> + ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> + slpc->min_freq);
> + }
> +
> intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
> mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
> return ret;
> @@ -602,9 +609,8 @@ static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> return ret;
>
> if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit) {
> - ret = intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(slpc, &slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
> - if (unlikely(ret))
> - return ret;
> + /* Min softlimit is initialized to RPn */
> + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq;
> slpc_to_gt(slpc)->defaults.min_freq = slpc->min_freq_softlimit;
> } else {
> return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc,
> @@ -755,6 +761,9 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /* Set cached value of ignore efficient freq */
> + intel_guc_slpc_set_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, slpc->ignore_eff_freq);
> +
> /* Revert SLPC min/max to softlimits if necessary */
> ret = slpc_set_softlimits(slpc);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> @@ -765,9 +774,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> /* Set cached media freq ratio mode */
> intel_guc_slpc_set_media_ratio_mode(slpc, slpc->media_ratio_mode);
>
> - /* Set cached value of ignore efficient freq */
> - intel_guc_slpc_set_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, slpc->ignore_eff_freq);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.38.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 1:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Restore efficient freq earlier Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-07-26 1:00 ` Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-07-26 2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Restore efficient freq earlier (rev2) Patchwork
2023-07-27 20:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Restore efficient freq earlier (rev3) Patchwork
2023-07-28 1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-08-02 0:41 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-08-11 0:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-11 17:54 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-08-14 16:02 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-28 15:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMPgfvUneE1RjROi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.