From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: leon@kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, jhack@hpe.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 7/9] RDMA/rxe: Add elem->valid field
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:15:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMf6Leyf17GevsdJ@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721205021.5394-8-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 03:50:20PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> Currently the rxe driver stores NULL in the pool xarray to
> indicate that the pool element should not be looked up from its
> index. This prevents looping over pool elements during driver
> cleanup. This patch adds a new valid field to struct rxe_pool_elem
> as an alternative way to accomplish the same thing.
Wah? Why? Yuk.
> @@ -249,13 +252,6 @@ int __rxe_put(struct rxe_pool_elem *elem)
>
> void __rxe_finalize(struct rxe_pool_elem *elem, bool sleepable)
> {
> - gfp_t gfp_flags = sleepable ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC;
> - struct xarray *xa = &elem->pool->xa;
> - unsigned long flags;
> - void *xa_ret;
> -
> - xa_lock_irqsave(xa, flags);
> - xa_ret = __xa_store(xa, elem->index, elem, gfp_flags);
> - xa_unlock_irqrestore(xa, flags);
> - WARN_ON(xa_err(xa_ret));
> + /* allow looking up element from index */
> + smp_store_release(&elem->valid, 1);
> }
That is horrible, why?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 20:50 [PATCH for-next 0/9] RDMA/rxe: Misc fixes and cleanups Bob Pearson
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 1/9] RDMA/rxe: Fix handling sleepable in rxe_pool.c Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 2/9] RDMA/rxe: Fix xarray locking " Bob Pearson
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 3/9] RDMA/rxe: Fix freeing busy objects Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:16 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 4/9] RDMA/rxe: Fix delayed send packet handling Bob Pearson
2023-07-23 13:03 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-07-23 17:24 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-24 17:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-24 18:26 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:20 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:33 ` Bob Pearson
2023-08-04 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 5/9] RDMA/rxe: Optimize rxe_init_packet in rxe_net.c Bob Pearson
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 6/9] RDMA/rxe: Delete unused field elem->list Bob Pearson
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 7/9] RDMA/rxe: Add elem->valid field Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 8/9] RDMA/rxe: Report leaked objects Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:23 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:42 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:51 ` Bob Pearson
2023-08-04 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-21 20:50 ` [PATCH for-next 9/9] RDMA/rxe: Protect pending send packets Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:26 ` Bob Pearson
2023-07-31 18:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 18:44 ` Bob Pearson
2023-08-01 22:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 14:39 ` Bob Pearson
2023-08-02 14:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMf6Leyf17GevsdJ@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhack@hpe.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.