From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] Fix CONFIG_TLB_PTLOCK to work with lightweight spinlock checks
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 23:43:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNlOiJMddf15RaGj@p100> (raw)
For the TLB_PTLOCK checks we used an optimization to store the spc
register into the spinlock to unlock it. This optimization works as
long as the lightweight spinlock checks (CONFIG_LIGHTWEIGHT_SPINLOCK_CHECK)
aren't enabled, because they really check if the lock word is zero or
__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED_VAL and abort with a kernel crash
("Spinlock was trashed") otherwise.
Drop that optimization to make it possible to activate both checks
at the same time.
Noticed-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Fixes: 15e64ef6520e ("parisc: Add lightweight spinlock checks")
---
v2:
- missed to fix another unlock in previous patch
- resend, because my mail provider decided to scramble my outgoing
mails and drop tabs, so that the patches don't apply cleanly
any longer.
---
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
index 0e5ebfe8d9d2..8cd88a1bf588 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/thread_info.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/spinlock_types.h>
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
@@ -406,7 +407,7 @@
LDREG 0(\ptp),\pte
bb,<,n \pte,_PAGE_PRESENT_BIT,3f
b \fault
- stw \spc,0(\tmp)
+ stw \tmp1,0(\tmp) /* restore lock value */
99: ALTERNATIVE(98b, 99b, ALT_COND_NO_SMP, INSN_NOP)
#endif
2: LDREG 0(\ptp),\pte
@@ -415,24 +416,22 @@
.endm
/* Release page_table_lock without reloading lock address.
- Note that the values in the register spc are limited to
- NR_SPACE_IDS (262144). Thus, the stw instruction always
- stores a nonzero value even when register spc is 64 bits.
We use an ordered store to ensure all prior accesses are
performed prior to releasing the lock. */
- .macro ptl_unlock0 spc,tmp
+ .macro ptl_unlock0 spc,tmp,tmp2
#ifdef CONFIG_TLB_PTLOCK
-98: or,COND(=) %r0,\spc,%r0
- stw,ma \spc,0(\tmp)
+98: ldi __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED_VAL, \tmp2
+ or,COND(=) %r0,\spc,%r0
+ stw,ma \tmp2,0(\tmp)
99: ALTERNATIVE(98b, 99b, ALT_COND_NO_SMP, INSN_NOP)
#endif
.endm
/* Release page_table_lock. */
- .macro ptl_unlock1 spc,tmp
+ .macro ptl_unlock1 spc,tmp,tmp2
#ifdef CONFIG_TLB_PTLOCK
98: get_ptl \tmp
- ptl_unlock0 \spc,\tmp
+ ptl_unlock0 \spc,\tmp,\tmp2
99: ALTERNATIVE(98b, 99b, ALT_COND_NO_SMP, INSN_NOP)
#endif
.endm
@@ -1125,7 +1124,7 @@ dtlb_miss_20w:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1151,7 +1150,7 @@ nadtlb_miss_20w:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1185,7 +1184,7 @@ dtlb_miss_11:
mtsp t1, %sr1 /* Restore sr1 */
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1218,7 +1217,7 @@ nadtlb_miss_11:
mtsp t1, %sr1 /* Restore sr1 */
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1247,7 +1246,7 @@ dtlb_miss_20:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1275,7 +1274,7 @@ nadtlb_miss_20:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1320,7 +1319,7 @@ itlb_miss_20w:
iitlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1344,7 +1343,7 @@ naitlb_miss_20w:
iitlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1378,7 +1377,7 @@ itlb_miss_11:
mtsp t1, %sr1 /* Restore sr1 */
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1402,7 +1401,7 @@ naitlb_miss_11:
mtsp t1, %sr1 /* Restore sr1 */
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1432,7 +1431,7 @@ itlb_miss_20:
iitlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1452,7 +1451,7 @@ naitlb_miss_20:
iitlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock1 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock1 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1482,7 +1481,7 @@ dbit_trap_20w:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock0 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock0 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
#else
@@ -1508,7 +1507,7 @@ dbit_trap_11:
mtsp t1, %sr1 /* Restore sr1 */
- ptl_unlock0 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock0 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
@@ -1528,7 +1527,7 @@ dbit_trap_20:
idtlbt pte,prot
- ptl_unlock0 spc,t0
+ ptl_unlock0 spc,t0,t1
rfir
nop
#endif
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-13 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-13 21:43 Helge Deller [this message]
2023-08-14 2:06 ` [PATCH v2] Fix CONFIG_TLB_PTLOCK to work with lightweight spinlock checks Sam James
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNlOiJMddf15RaGj@p100 \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.