All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] KVM: x86: Add a framework for enabling KVM-governed x86 features
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:20:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNpiaGsEnoOxAspP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ba1020-bfbe-dcab-1d8c-961f30c7bf12@intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, Zeng Guang wrote:
> 
> On 7/29/2023 9:15 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +static __always_inline int kvm_governed_feature_index(unsigned int x86_feature)
> > +{
> > +	switch (x86_feature) {
> > +#define KVM_GOVERNED_FEATURE(x) case x: return KVM_GOVERNED_##x;
> > +#include "governed_features.h"
> > +	default:
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static __always_inline int kvm_is_governed_feature(unsigned int x86_feature)
> > +{
> > +	return kvm_governed_feature_index(x86_feature) >= 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I think it proper to return a bool, not "int" instead.

Yeah.  I'm pretty sure someone brought this up in v1 too, and I spaced on it.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-29  1:15 [PATCH v2 00/21] KVM: x86: Add "governed" X86_FEATURE framework Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] KVM: nSVM: Check instead of asserting on nested TSC scaling support Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] KVM: nSVM: Load L1's TSC multiplier based on L1 state, not L2 state Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] KVM: nSVM: Use the "outer" helper for writing multiplier to MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] KVM: SVM: Clean up preemption toggling related " Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] KVM: x86: Always write vCPU's current TSC offset/ratio in vendor hooks Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] KVM: nSVM: Skip writes to MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO if guest state isn't loaded Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] KVM: x86: Add a framework for enabling KVM-governed x86 features Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14  4:43   ` Zeng Guang
2023-08-14 17:20     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "GBPAGES enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] KVM: VMX: Recompute "XSAVES enabled" only after CPUID update Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] KVM: VMX: Check KVM CPU caps, not just VMX MSR support, for XSAVE enabling Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] KVM: VMX: Rename XSAVES control to follow KVM's preferred "ENABLE_XYZ" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] KVM: x86: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "XSAVES enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14  6:28   ` Zeng Guang
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] KVM: nVMX: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "nested VMX enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14  8:11   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "NRIPS enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "TSC scaling enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vVM{SAVE,LOAD} enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "LBRv enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "Pause Filter enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vGIF enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vNMI enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] KVM: x86: Disallow guest CPUID lookups when IRQs are disabled Sean Christopherson
2023-08-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] KVM: x86: Add "governed" X86_FEATURE framework Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNpiaGsEnoOxAspP@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.