From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpiolib: fix reference leaks when removing GPIO chips still in use
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:49:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNtKQlnQxFediB0J@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811193034.59124-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> After we remove a GPIO chip that still has some requested descriptors,
> gpiod_free_commit() will fail and we will never put the references to the
> GPIO device and the owning module in gpiod_free().
>
> Rework this function to:
> - not warn on desc == NULL as this is a use-case on which most free
> functions silently return
> - put the references to desc->gdev and desc->gdev->owner unconditionally
> so that the release callback actually gets called when the remaining
> references are dropped by external GPIO users
...
> - if (desc && desc->gdev && gpiod_free_commit(desc)) {
The commit message doesn't explain disappearing of gdev check.
> - module_put(desc->gdev->owner);
> - gpio_device_put(desc->gdev);
> - } else {
> + /*
> + * We must not use VALIDATE_DESC_VOID() as the underlying gdev->chip
> + * may already be NULL but we still want to put the references.
> + */
> + if (!desc)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!gpiod_free_commit(desc))
> WARN_ON(extra_checks);
> - }
> +
> + module_put(desc->gdev->owner);
> + gpio_device_put(desc->gdev);
> }
So, if gdev can be NULL, you will get an Oops with new code.
To keep a status quo this needs to be rewritten.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 19:30 [PATCH v3] gpiolib: fix reference leaks when removing GPIO chips still in use Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-08-15 8:25 ` Linus Walleij
2023-08-15 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-15 11:40 ` Linus Walleij
2023-08-15 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-15 13:07 ` Linus Walleij
2023-08-15 14:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-15 14:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-15 18:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-08-16 11:37 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNtKQlnQxFediB0J@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.