From: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stone.xulei@xfusion.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Refactor task_flags check for worker sleeping
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:53:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOIMvURE99ZRAYEj@fedora> (raw)
Simplify the conditional logic for checking worker flags
by splitting the original compound `if` statement into
separate `if` and `else if` clauses. This modification not
only retains the previous functionality but also reduces a
single `if` check, improving code clarity and potentially
enhancing performance.
Signed-off-by: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c52c2eba7c73..9621ee979b0b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6745,12 +6745,10 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
* If a worker goes to sleep, notify and ask workqueue whether it
* wants to wake up a task to maintain concurrency.
*/
- if (task_flags & (PF_WQ_WORKER | PF_IO_WORKER)) {
- if (task_flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
- wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
- else
- io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
- }
+ if (task_flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
+ wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
+ else if (task_flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
+ io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
/*
* spinlock and rwlock must not flush block requests. This will
--
2.40.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-20 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-20 12:53 Wang Jinchao [this message]
2023-09-24 10:39 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/core: Refactor the task_flags check for worker sleeping in sched_submit_work() tip-bot2 for Wang Jinchao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOIMvURE99ZRAYEj@fedora \
--to=wangjinchao@xfusion.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stone.xulei@xfusion.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.