From: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: generic/352 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:55:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOZkRkAliLCTOzdI@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823164641.GA11251@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:46:41AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> > xfs_io pwrite issues a series of block size writes, but there is no guarantee
> > that the resulting extent(s) will be singular or contiguous. This behavior is
> > acceptable, but the test is flawed in that it expects a single extent for a
> > pwrite.
> >
> > Modify test to accept any layout for the reflinked logical range.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/generic/352 | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > tests/generic/352.out | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/352 b/tests/generic/352
> > index 52ec4850..c4ee8a44 100755
> > --- a/tests/generic/352
> > +++ b/tests/generic/352
> > @@ -48,19 +48,25 @@ _pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $file | _filter_xfs_io
> > # use reflink to create the rest of the file, whose all extents are all
> > # pointing to the first extent
> > for i in $(seq 1 $nr); do
> > - _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > /dev/null
> > + _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > $tmp1.out
>
> $tmp1 isnt defined anywhere.
>
> > done
> >
> > # then call fiemap on that file to test both the shared flag and if
> > # reserved extent mapping search will cause soft lockup
> > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp.out
> > -cat $tmp.out >> $seqres.full
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp2.out
> > +cat $tmp2.out >> $seqres.full
>
> Nor is $tmp2
Do $tmp1 and $tmp2 actually need to be declared?
>
> >
> > # refact the $LOAD_FACTOR to 1 to match the golden output
> > sed -i -e "s/$(($last_extent - 1))/$(($orig_last_extent - 1))/" \
> > -e "s/$last_extent/$orig_last_extent/" \
> > - -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp.out
> > -cat $tmp.out
> > + -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp2.out
> > +
> > +cat $tmp1.out > tmp.1
> > +cat $tmp2.out > tmp.2
>
> Not sure why you didn't make the _reflink_range and the fiemap above
> output to $tmp.out1 and $tmp.out2, respectively. If you had, then the
> default _cleanup would delete $tmp.* automatically...
>
> > +
> > +diff tmp.[12]
> > +rm tmp.1
> > +rm tmp.2
>
> ...and the rm here wouldn't be necessary.
But how to [diff $tmp.out1 $tmp.out2]? I don't see that working.
>
> Ok. Nitpicking over. Moving on to the weirder design questions of the
> original test:
>
> [add original test author to cc]
>
> I don't know why $blocksize is set to 128k above. If this test needs to
> guarantee that there would only be *one* extent (and the golden output
> implies this as you note), then it should have been written to say:
>
> blocksize=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
>
> But I don't know if the "btrfs soft lock up and return wrong shared
> flag" behavior required sharing a (probably multi-block) 128k range, or
> if that was simply what the author selected because it reproduced the
> problem.
>
> >
> > # success, all done
> > status=0
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/352.out b/tests/generic/352.out
> > index 4ff66c21..ad90ae0d 100644
> > --- a/tests/generic/352.out
> > +++ b/tests/generic/352.out
> > @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
> > QA output created by 352
> > wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
> > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> > -0: [0..2097151]: shared
> > -1: [2097152..2097407]: shared|last
>
> Also I suspect from the test description that the goal here was to
> detect the golden output failing because the shared flag does not get
> reported correctly.
That's my interpretation as well.
Thanks-
Bill
>
> --D
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 15:43 [PATCH] fstests: generic/352 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-23 19:55 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2023-08-23 20:42 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 21:01 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 22:18 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-23 22:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-24 0:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-08-24 3:38 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-24 6:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-08-24 12:11 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-24 18:16 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOZkRkAliLCTOzdI@redhat.com \
--to=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.