From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Don't override scu in intel_scu_ipc_dev_simple_command()
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:18:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP+EKLClR1ldvY4x@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230911193937.302552-4-swboyd@chromium.org>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:39:35PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Andy discovered this bug during patch review. The 'scu' argument to this
> function shouldn't be overridden by the function itself. It doesn't make
> any sense. Looking at the commit history, we see that commit
> f57fa18583f5 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API")
> removed the setting of the scu to ipcdev in other functions, but not
> this one. That was an oversight. Remove this line so that we stop
> overriding the scu instance that is used by this function.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 19:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Timeout fixes Stephen Boyd
2023-09-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Check status after timeout in busy_loop() Stephen Boyd
2023-09-11 21:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-11 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-11 21:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-09-12 5:02 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-09-12 5:04 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-09-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Check status upon timeout in ipc_wait_for_interrupt() Stephen Boyd
2023-09-12 5:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-09-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Don't override scu in intel_scu_ipc_dev_simple_command() Stephen Boyd
2023-09-11 21:18 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-09-12 5:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-09-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Fail IPC send if still busy Stephen Boyd
2023-09-11 21:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-12 5:01 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZP+EKLClR1ldvY4x@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.