All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Dapeng1 Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Synthesize at most one PMI per VM-exit
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:46:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQ3hD+zBCkZxZclS@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901185646.2823254-1-jmattson@google.com>

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023, Jim Mattson wrote:
> When the irq_work callback, kvm_pmi_trigger_fn(), is invoked during a
> VM-exit that also invokes __kvm_perf_overflow() as a result of
> instruction emulation, kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() will be called twice
> before the next VM-entry.
> 
> That shouldn't be a problem. The local APIC is supposed to
> automatically set the mask flag in LVTPC when it handles a PMI, so the
> second PMI should be inhibited. However, KVM's local APIC emulation
> fails to set the mask flag in LVTPC when it handles a PMI, so two PMIs
> are delivered via the local APIC. In the common case, where LVTPC is
> configured to deliver an NMI, the first NMI is vectored through the
> guest IDT, and the second one is held pending. When the NMI handler
> returns, the second NMI is vectored through the IDT. For Linux guests,
> this results in the "dazed and confused" spurious NMI message.
> 
> Though the obvious fix is to set the mask flag in LVTPC when handling
> a PMI, KVM's logic around synthesizing a PMI is unnecessarily
> convoluted.

To address Like's question about whether not this is necessary, I think we should
rephrase this to explicitly state this is a bug irrespective of the whole LVTPC
masking thing.

And I think it makes sense to swap the order of the two patches.  The LVTPC masking
fix is a clearcut architectural violation.  This is a bit more of a grey area,
though still blatantly buggy.

So, put this patch second, and replace the above paragraphs with something like?

  Calling kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() twice is unlikely to be problematic now that
  KVM sets the LVTPC mask bit when delivering a PMI.  But using IRQ work to
  trigger the PMI is still broken, albeit very theoretically.

  E.g. if the self-IPI to trigger IRQ work is be delayed long enough for the
  vCPU to be migrated to a different pCPU, then it's possible for
  kvm_pmi_trigger_fn() to race with the kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() from
  KVM_REQ_PMI and still generate two PMIs.

  KVM could set the mask bit using an atomic operation, but that'd just be
  piling on unnecessary code to workaround what is effectively a hack.  The
  *only* reason KVM uses IRQ work is to ensure the PMI is treated as a wake
  event, e.g. if the vCPU just executed HLT.

> Remove the irq_work callback for synthesizing a PMI, and all of the
> logic for invoking it. Instead, to prevent a vcpu from leaving C0 with
> a PMI pending, add a check for KVM_REQ_PMI to kvm_vcpu_has_events().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-22 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-01 18:56 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Synthesize at most one PMI per VM-exit Jim Mattson
2023-09-01 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Mask LVTPC when handling a PMI Jim Mattson
2023-09-02 19:06   ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-06  8:59   ` Mi, Dapeng1
2023-09-22 18:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-25 17:52     ` Jim Mattson
2023-09-25 18:00       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-02 19:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Synthesize at most one PMI per VM-exit Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-06  9:17 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-09-06 20:54   ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-07  6:29     ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-09-14 11:57 ` Like Xu
2023-09-14 14:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-09-22 19:04   ` Jim Mattson
2023-09-22 19:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22 20:25       ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-22 20:34         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22 20:49           ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-22 21:02             ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-22 22:44               ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-25  6:00                 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 19:54               ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-22 21:06             ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22 22:42               ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-22 23:00                 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-25  6:09                   ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 16:22                     ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 17:06                       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-25  7:06                 ` Like Xu
2023-09-25  7:33       ` Like Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-25 17:34 [PATCH 0/2] Fix the duplicate PMI injections in vPMU Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Synthesize at most one PMI per VM-exit Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 17:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-25 19:33     ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-09-25 21:28       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQ3hD+zBCkZxZclS@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkagan@amazon.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.