From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:56:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQS25Cfog54gH4k2@unerlige-ril> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169475627315.32041.7069993158124024215@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:37:53AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
>
>Series: i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active
>URL: [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123744/
>State: failure
>Details: [2]https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13635 -> Patchwork_123744v1
>
>Summary
>
> FAILURE
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_123744v1 absolutely need to
> be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_123744v1, please notify your bug team
> (lgci.bug.filing@intel.com) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (40 -> 40)
>
> Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka
> Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
>
>Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_123744v1:
>
> IGT changes
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
>
> * fi-skl-guc: [3]PASS -> [4]DMESG-FAIL
Not related to changes in this patch. Ran the test a couple times on MTL
and not seeing any failures.
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@perf:
>
> * fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [5]ABORT
Unrelated since this does not use GuC.
Umesh
>
>Known issues
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 1:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-15 5:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-09-15 19:56 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2023-09-15 23:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2023-09-19 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQS25Cfog54gH4k2@unerlige-ril \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.