From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, bvanassche@acm.org,
kbusch@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] blk-mq: account active requests when get driver tag
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 20:39:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQWiBpBMM7I9L57O@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913151616.3164338-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:16:12PM +0000, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>
> There is a limit that batched queue_rqs() can't work on shared tags
> queue, since the account of active requests can't be done there.
>
> Now we account the active requests only in blk_mq_get_driver_tag(),
> which is not the time we get driver tag actually (with none elevator).
>
> To support batched queue_rqs() on shared tags queue, we move the
> account of active requests to where we get the driver tag:
>
> 1. none elevator: blk_mq_get_tags() and blk_mq_get_tag()
> 2. other elevator: __blk_mq_alloc_driver_tag()
>
> This is clearer and match with the unaccount side, which just happen
> when we put the driver tag.
>
> The other good point is that we don't need RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT trick
> anymore, which used to avoid double account of flush request.
> Now we only account when actually get the driver tag, so all is good.
> We will remove RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> ---
Nice cleanup,
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-16 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 15:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] blk-mq: optimize queue_rqs() support chengming.zhou
2023-09-13 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] blk-mq: account active requests when get driver tag chengming.zhou
2023-09-16 9:23 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-16 9:32 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-09-16 12:39 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-09-13 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] blk-mq: remove RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT chengming.zhou
2023-09-16 12:40 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-13 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] blk-mq: support batched queue_rqs() on shared tags queue chengming.zhou
2023-09-22 8:36 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-13 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] blk-mq: update driver tags request table when start request chengming.zhou
2023-09-22 8:49 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-13 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] block/null_blk: add queue_rqs() support chengming.zhou
2023-09-22 8:54 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-23 7:01 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-09-22 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] blk-mq: optimize " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQWiBpBMM7I9L57O@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.