All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: remove inlines from i915_gem_execbuffer.c
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:33:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQyoiuuJtwOuNTu2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921160637.3862597-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 07:06:37PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Just let the compiler decide what's best. Turns out absolutely nothing
> changes in the output with the inlines removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> 
> ---
> 
> The same should really be done for most inlines in .c files. *wink wink*

Indeed!

> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 20 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 7d04ec740fd1..683fd8d3151c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int eb_pin_engine(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, bool throttle);
>  static void eb_unpin_engine(struct i915_execbuffer *eb);
>  static void eb_capture_release(struct i915_execbuffer *eb);
>  
> -static inline bool eb_use_cmdparser(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> +static bool eb_use_cmdparser(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  {
>  	return intel_engine_requires_cmd_parser(eb->context->engine) ||
>  		(intel_engine_using_cmd_parser(eb->context->engine) &&
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static u64 eb_pin_flags(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
>  	return pin_flags;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int
> +static int
>  eb_pin_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	   const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
>  	   struct eb_vma *ev)
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ eb_pin_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void
> +static void
>  eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ eb_validate_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool
> +static bool
>  is_batch_buffer(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned int buffer_idx)
>  {
>  	return eb->args->flags & I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST ?
> @@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ eb_add_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int use_cpu_reloc(const struct reloc_cache *cache,
> -				const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +static int use_cpu_reloc(const struct reloc_cache *cache,
> +			 const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  {
>  	if (!i915_gem_object_has_struct_page(obj))
>  		return false;
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static void eb_destroy(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		kfree(eb->buckets);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64
> +static u64
>  relocation_target(const struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *reloc,
>  		  const struct i915_vma *target)
>  {
> @@ -1128,19 +1128,19 @@ static void reloc_cache_init(struct reloc_cache *cache,
>  	cache->node.flags = 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void *unmask_page(unsigned long p)
> +static void *unmask_page(unsigned long p)
>  {
>  	return (void *)(uintptr_t)(p & PAGE_MASK);
>  }
>  
> -static inline unsigned int unmask_flags(unsigned long p)
> +static unsigned int unmask_flags(unsigned long p)
>  {
>  	return p & ~PAGE_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  #define KMAP 0x4 /* after CLFLUSH_FLAGS */
>  
> -static inline struct i915_ggtt *cache_to_ggtt(struct reloc_cache *cache)
> +static struct i915_ggtt *cache_to_ggtt(struct reloc_cache *cache)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
>  		container_of(cache, struct i915_execbuffer, reloc_cache)->i915;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-21 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-21 16:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: remove inlines from i915_gem_execbuffer.c Jani Nikula
2023-09-21 20:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-09-22  4:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-09-23  0:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-25 14:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQyoiuuJtwOuNTu2@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.