From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: pcs: xpcs: Add 2500BASE-X case in get state for XPCS drivers
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRLuv77VSTXSZSc7@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhmdppifw4qverxedn6l3bk3tuwyuww7rcvqvtzbxhh5livowv@3jpc4m3kfgno>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 03:09:47PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hi Russell
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 02:39:21PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Hi Raju
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 01:21:42PM +0530, Raju Lakkaraju wrote:
> > > > Add DW_2500BASEX case in xpcs_get_state( ) to update speed, duplex and pause
> > > > Update the port mode and autonegotiation
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 4 ++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > index 4dbc21f604f2..4f89dcedf0fc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > > @@ -1090,6 +1090,30 @@ static int xpcs_get_state_c37_1000basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int xpcs_get_state_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > > + struct phylink_link_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int sts, lpa;
> > > > +
> > > > + sts = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_STS);
> > >
> > > > + lpa = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_LP_BABL);
> > > > + if (sts < 0 || lpa < 0) {
> > > > + state->link = false;
> > > > + return sts;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > The HW manual says: "The host uses this page to know the link
> > > partner's ability when the base page is received through Clause 37
> > > auto-negotiation." Seeing xpcs_config_2500basex() disables
> > > auto-negotiation and lpa value is unused anyway why do you even need
> > > to read the LP_BABL register?
> >
>
> > Since you have access to the hardware manual, what does it say about
> > clause 37 auto-negotiation when operating in 2500base-X mode?
>
> Here are the parts which mention 37 & SGMII AN in the 2.5G context:
>
> 1. "Clause 37 (& SGMII) auto-negotiation is supported in 2.5G mode if
> the link partner is also operating in the equivalent 2.5G mode."
>
> 2. "During the Clause 37/SGMII as the auto-negotiation link timer
> operates with a faster clock in the 2.5G mode, the timeout duration
> reduces by a factor of 2.5. To restore the standard specified timeout
> period, the respective registers must be re-programmed."
>
> I guess the entire 2.5G-thing understanding could be generalized by
> the next sentence from the HW manual: "The 2.5G mode of operation is
> functionally the same as 1000BASE-X/KX mode, except that the
> clock-rate is 2.5 times the original rate. In this mode, the
> Serdes/PHY operates at a serial baud-rate of 3.125 Gbps and DWC_xpcs
> data-path and the GMII interface to MAC operates at 312.5 MHz (instead
> of 125 MHz)." Thus here is another info regarding AN in that context:
>
> 3. "The DWC_xpcs operates either in 10/100/1000Mbps rate or
> 25/250/2500Mbps rates respectively with SGMII auto-negotiation. The
> DWC_xpcs cannot support switching or negotiation between 1G and 2.5G
> rates using auto-negotiation."
Thanks for the clarification.
So this hardware, just like Marvell hardware, operates 2500BASE-X merely
by up-clocking, and all the features that were available at 1000BASE-X
are also available at 2500BASE-X, including the in-band signalling.
Therefore, I think rather than disabling AN outright, the
PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_* mode passed in should be checked to determine whether
inband should be used or not.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 7:51 [PATCH net-next] net: pcs: xpcs: Add 2500BASE-X case in get state for XPCS drivers Raju Lakkaraju
2023-09-26 11:39 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 11:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-26 12:09 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 14:46 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-09-26 15:27 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-26 15:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-26 19:40 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRLuv77VSTXSZSc7@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=Raju.Lakkaraju@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.