From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3BFE7491F for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 21:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229744AbjJBVOP (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 17:14:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229671AbjJBVOO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 17:14:14 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [IPv6:2001:780:45:1d:225:90ff:fe52:c662]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5B6AB for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 14:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [78.30.34.192] (port=36640 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnQEy-00GNTW-7N; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 23:14:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 23:14:07 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: update element timeout support [was Re: [PATCH nf 1/2] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: move sync GC from insert path to set->ops->commit] Message-ID: References: <20230929164404.172081-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20230930081038.GB23327@breakpoint.cc> <20231001210816.GA15564@breakpoint.cc> <20231002135838.GB30843@breakpoint.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:10:42PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I think it is not a good idea to expand a element that has already > expired. There might be another possible corner case: > > Refresh element E1 with timeout X -> not expired yet > Element E1 expires > Refresh element E1 with timeout Y -> already expired, ENOENT. Oh, I see, you mentioned this problem in another email. This actually results in a new element to be added, with my proposal, no ENOENT is ever hit. I get your point, this needs to be sorted out.