All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <ZRtxoaJdVF1C2Mvy@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2ef94c3..6f2b2c5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 On Mon, Oct 02, 2023, Anish Moorthy wrote:
-> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:28?AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
+> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:28 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > > So when exit reason is KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT, how can we tell which field in
 > > > the first union is valid?
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ I'll look at this more closely when I review your series (slowly, slowly getting
 there).  There's no right or wrong answer here, it's more a question of what's the
 easiest to maintain.
 
-> [a] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-5-amoorthy at google.com/
-> [b] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-11-amoorthy at google.com/
+> [a] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-5-amoorthy@google.com/
+> [b] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-11-amoorthy@google.com/
 > 
 > > And if we stop being unnecessarily paranoid, KVM_RUN_MEMORY_FAULT_FILLED can also
 > > go away.  The flag came about in part because *unconditionally* sanitizing
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 68d89ec..83fb4c7 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,13 +4,40 @@
  "ref\0ZQ3AmLO2SYv3DszH@google.com\0"
  "ref\0CAF7b7mrf-y9DNdsreOAedGJueOThnYE=ascFd4=rvW0Z4rhTQg@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[RFC PATCH v12 07/33] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH v12 07/33] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 2 Oct 2023 18:42:57 -0700\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>"
+  Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
+  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
+  Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
+  Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
+  Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
+  Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
+  kvm@vger.kernel.org
+  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
+  kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
+  Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
+  Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
+  Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
+  Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
+  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
+  Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
+  Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
+  Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
+  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+  Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
+  Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
+  Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
+ " Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, Oct 02, 2023, Anish Moorthy wrote:\n"
- "> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:28?AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:\n"
+ "> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:28\342\200\257AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > > So when exit reason is KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT, how can we tell which field in\n"
  "> > > the first union is valid?\n"
@@ -160,8 +187,8 @@
  "there).  There's no right or wrong answer here, it's more a question of what's the\n"
  "easiest to maintain.\n"
  "\n"
- "> [a] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-5-amoorthy at google.com/\n"
- "> [b] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-11-amoorthy at google.com/\n"
+ "> [a] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-5-amoorthy@google.com/\n"
+ "> [b] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-11-amoorthy@google.com/\n"
  "> \n"
  "> > And if we stop being unnecessarily paranoid, KVM_RUN_MEMORY_FAULT_FILLED can also\n"
  "> > go away.  The flag came about in part because *unconditionally* sanitizing\n"
@@ -206,4 +233,4 @@
  "that we only commit to 100% accuracy for the paths that the two use cases need to\n"
  work, i.e. the page fault handlers.
 
-853243b1dd6112074e5b4e01fd9fdde04fd25af4ce19834a7aca4b2989a84fc8
+040487f2cff4c081c97b401d3b18deac2a4a1d3fbc2e7c789910bda494c73460

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.