From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/shutdown: change default reboot method preference
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:35:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRv8fRhYQrwU1H6q@MacBookPdeRoger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b045e8fe-ccf7-bbcd-ece8-036a13858d36@suse.com>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:21:44AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.09.2023 09:43, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The current logic to chose the preferred reboot method is based on the mode Xen
> > has been booted into, so if the box is booted from UEFI, the preferred reboot
> > method will be to use the ResetSystem() run time service call.
> >
> > However, that method seems to be widely untested, and quite often leads to a
> > result similar to:
> >
> > Hardware Dom0 shutdown: rebooting machine
> > ----[ Xen-4.18-unstable x86_64 debug=y Tainted: C ]----
> > CPU: 0
> > RIP: e008:[<0000000000000017>] 0000000000000017
> > RFLAGS: 0000000000010202 CONTEXT: hypervisor
> > [...]
> > Xen call trace:
> > [<0000000000000017>] R 0000000000000017
> > [<ffff83207eff7b50>] S ffff83207eff7b50
> > [<ffff82d0403525aa>] F machine_restart+0x1da/0x261
> > [<ffff82d04035263c>] F apic_wait_icr_idle+0/0x37
> > [<ffff82d040233689>] F smp_call_function_interrupt+0xc7/0xcb
> > [<ffff82d040352f05>] F call_function_interrupt+0x20/0x34
> > [<ffff82d04033b0d5>] F do_IRQ+0x150/0x6f3
> > [<ffff82d0402018c2>] F common_interrupt+0x132/0x140
> > [<ffff82d040283d33>] F arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c#acpi_idle_do_entry+0x113/0x129
> > [<ffff82d04028436c>] F arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c#acpi_processor_idle+0x3eb/0x5f7
> > [<ffff82d04032a549>] F arch/x86/domain.c#idle_loop+0xec/0xee
> >
> > ****************************************
> > Panic on CPU 0:
> > FATAL TRAP: vector = 6 (invalid opcode)
> > ****************************************
> >
> > Which in most cases does lead to a reboot, however that's unreliable.
> >
> > Change the default reboot preference to prefer ACPI over UEFI if available and
> > not in reduced hardware mode.
> >
> > This is in line to what Linux does, so it's unlikely to cause issues on current
> > and future hardware, since there's a much higher chance of vendors testing
> > hardware with Linux rather than Xen.
> >
> > Add a special case for one Acer model that does require being rebooted using
> > ResetSystem(). See Linux commit 0082517fa4bce for rationale.
> >
> > I'm not aware of using ACPI reboot causing issues on boxes that do have
> > properly implemented ResetSystem() methods.
>
> A data point from a new system I'm still in the process of setting up: The
> ACPI reboot method, as used by Linux, unconditionally means a warm reboot.
> The EFI method, otoh, properly distinguishes "reboot=warm" from our default
> of explicitly requesting cold reboot. (Without taking the EFI path, I
> assume our write to the relevant BDA location simply has no effect, for
> this being a legacy BIOS thing, and the system apparently defaults to warm
> reboot when using the ACPI method.)
This is unfortunate, but IMO not as worse as getting a #UD or any
other fault while attempting a reboot. We can always force this
system to use UEFI reboot, if that does work better than ACPI.
> Clearly, as a secondary effect, this system adds to my personal experience
> of so far EFI reboot consistently working on all x86 hardware I have (had)
> direct access to. (That said, this is the first non-Intel system, which
> likely biases my overall experience.)
I can try to gather some data, I can at least tell you that the Intel
NUC11TNHi7 TGL does also hit a fault when attempting UEFI reboot.
The above crash was from a Dell PowerEdge R6625. I do recall seeing
this with other boxes on the Citrix lab, but don't know the exact
models. I'm quite sure other downstreams can provide similar
feedback.
I think it's clear now that using ResetSystem() when booted from UEFI
is not mandated by the UEFI specification, so I still stand by this
patch and think we should select the default reboot method that has
the highest chance of succeeding.
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 7:43 [PATCH v2] x86/shutdown: change default reboot method preference Roger Pau Monne
2023-09-18 12:26 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-18 15:09 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-09-18 15:44 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-18 16:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-09-19 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-19 10:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-09-27 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-03 11:35 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2023-10-23 11:02 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-29 22:08 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2026-02-13 0:39 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2026-02-13 7:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRv8fRhYQrwU1H6q@MacBookPdeRoger \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.