All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] gpiolib: reverse-assign the fwnode to struct gpio_chip
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:14:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSAIUVAQ6ifi8LTL@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006115147.18559-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> struct gpio_chip is not only used to carry the information needed to
> set-up a GPIO device but is also used in all GPIOLIB callbacks and is
> passed to the matching functions of lookup helpers.
> 
> In that last case, it is currently impossible to match a GPIO device by
> fwnode unless it was explicitly assigned to the chip in the provider
> code.

That's expected behaviour.

> If the fwnode is taken from the parent device, the pointer in
> struct gpio_chip will remain NULL.

> If we have a parent device but gc->fwnode was not assigned by the
> provider, let's assign it ourselves so that lookup by fwnode can work in
> all cases.

I don't think this is a good change. We paper over the real issue where
we and callers need to understand what they are looking for.

...

> This is something that Dipen reported with one of the tegra drivers where
> a GPIO lookup by fwnode does not work because the fwnode pointer in struct
> gpio_chip is NULL. This patch addresses this use-case.

I am not sure I understand the problem here. All these should have been
addressed already, no?

So, the GPIOLIB should use dev_fwnode(&gdev->dev) inside it, outside it
the GPIO drivers are free to use gc->fwnode as long as they understand
the lifetime of the respective object.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06 11:51 [RFC/RFT PATCH] gpiolib: reverse-assign the fwnode to struct gpio_chip Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-10-06 19:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-07  7:45     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07 15:53       ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-09 18:28       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 19:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 22:22     ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07  7:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07  7:36     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 22:14 ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07  7:03   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSAIUVAQ6ifi8LTL@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dipenp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.