From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: Ethernet issue on imx6
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 20:39:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZShLX/ghL/b1Gbyz@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012193410.3d1812cf@xps-13>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 07:34:10PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been scratching my foreheads for weeks on a strange imx6
> network issue, I need help to go further, as I feel a bit clueless now.
>
> Here is my setup :
> - Custom imx6q board
> - Bootloader: U-Boot 2017.11 (also tried with a 2016.03)
> - Kernel : 4.14(.69,.146,.322), v5.10 and v6.5 with the same behavior
> - The MAC (fec driver) is connected to a Micrel 9031 PHY
> - The PHY is connected to the link partner through an industrial cable
"industrial cable" ?
> - Testing 100BASE-T (link is stable)
Would that be full or half duplex?
> The RGMII-ID timings are probably not totally optimal but offer rather
> good performance. In UDP with iperf3:
> * Downlink (host to the board) runs at full speed with 0% drop
> * Uplink (board to host) runs at full speed with <1% drop
>
> However, if I ever try to limit the bandwidth in uplink (only), the drop
> rate rises significantly, up to 30%:
>
> //192.168.1.1 is my host, so the below lines are from the board:
> # iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b100M
> [ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 113 MBytes 94.6 Mbits/sec 0.044 ms 467/82603 (0.57%) receiver
> # iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b90M
> [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 90.5 MBytes 75.6 Mbits/sec 0.146 ms 12163/77688 (16%) receiver
> # iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b80M
> [ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 66.4 MBytes 55.5 Mbits/sec 0.162 ms 20937/69055 (30%) receiver
My setup:
i.MX6DL silicon rev 1.3
Atheros AR8035 PHY
6.3.0+ (no significant changes to fec_main.c)
Link, being BASE-T, is standard RJ45.
Connectivity is via a bridge device (sorry, can't change that as it would
be too disruptive, as this is my Internet router!)
Running at 1000BASE-T (FD):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 114 MBytes 95.4 Mbits/sec 0.030 ms 0/82363 (0%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 107 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.103 ms 0/77691 (0%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.101 ms 0/69060 (0%) receiver
Running at 100BASE-Tx (FD):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 114 MBytes 95.4 Mbits/sec 0.008 ms 0/82436 (0%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 107 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.088 ms 0/77692 (0%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.108 ms 0/69058 (0%) receiver
Running at 100bASE-Tx (HD):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 114 MBytes 95.3 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 0/82304 (0%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 107 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.101 ms 1/77691 (0.0013%) receiver
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.105 ms 0/69058 (0%) receiver
So I'm afraid I don't see your issue.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 17:34 Ethernet issue on imx6 Miquel Raynal
2023-10-12 19:39 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-10-13 8:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 10:16 ` Wei Fang
2023-10-16 11:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 13:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 15:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 21:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-17 11:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-12 20:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-12 22:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-13 8:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 15:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-27 20:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-17 15:09 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 8:48 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-16 13:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 14:41 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-17 10:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-18 9:08 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-27 20:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 8:50 ` James Chapman
2023-10-13 10:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 11:54 ` James Chapman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZShLX/ghL/b1Gbyz@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.