From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
lokeshgidra@google.com, david@redhat.com, hughd@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, rppt@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, jannh@google.com,
zhangpeng362@huawei.com, bgeffon@google.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, ngeoffray@google.com, jdduke@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 18:29:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZShzSvrN7FgdXi71@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009064230.2952396-4-surenb@google.com>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:42:28PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Add a test for new UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl which uses uffd to move source
> into destination buffer while checking the contents of both after
> remapping. After the operation the content of the destination buffer
> should match the original source buffer's content while the source
> buffer should be zeroed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 41 ++++++++++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> index 02b89860e193..ecc1244f1c2b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ static int anon_allocate_area(void **alloc_area, bool is_src)
> *alloc_area = NULL;
> return -errno;
> }
> +
> + /* Prevent source pages from collapsing into THPs */
> + if (madvise(*alloc_area, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE)) {
> + *alloc_area = NULL;
> + return -errno;
> + }
Can we move this to test specific code?
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -484,8 +491,14 @@ void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg, struct uffd_args *args)
> offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg->arg.pagefault.address - area_dst;
> offset &= ~(page_size-1);
>
> - if (copy_page(uffd, offset, args->apply_wp))
> - args->missing_faults++;
> + /* UFFD_MOVE is supported for anon non-shared mappings. */
> + if (uffd_test_ops == &anon_uffd_test_ops && !map_shared) {
IIUC this means move_page() will start to run on many other tests... as
long as anonymous & private. Probably not wanted, because not all tests
may need this MOVE test, and it also means UFFDIO_COPY is never tested on
anonymous..
You can overwrite uffd_args.handle_fault(). Axel just added a hook which
seems also usable here. See 99aa77215ad02.
> + if (move_page(uffd, offset))
> + args->missing_faults++;
> + } else {
> + if (copy_page(uffd, offset, args->apply_wp))
> + args->missing_faults++;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -620,6 +633,30 @@ int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool wp)
> return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false, wp);
> }
>
> +int move_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + struct uffdio_move uffdio_move;
> +
> + if (offset >= nr_pages * page_size)
> + err("unexpected offset %lu\n", offset);
> + uffdio_move.dst = (unsigned long) area_dst + offset;
> + uffdio_move.src = (unsigned long) area_src + offset;
> + uffdio_move.len = page_size;
> + uffdio_move.mode = UFFDIO_MOVE_MODE_ALLOW_SRC_HOLES;
> + uffdio_move.move = 0;
> + if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_MOVE, &uffdio_move)) {
> + /* real retval in uffdio_move.move */
> + if (uffdio_move.move != -EEXIST)
> + err("UFFDIO_MOVE error: %"PRId64,
> + (int64_t)uffdio_move.move);
> + wake_range(ufd, uffdio_move.dst, page_size);
> + } else if (uffdio_move.move != page_size) {
> + err("UFFDIO_MOVE error: %"PRId64, (int64_t)uffdio_move.move);
> + } else
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags)
> {
> int fd, uffd;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> index 7c4fa964c3b0..f4d79e169a3d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp);
> void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg, struct uffd_args *args);
> int __copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool retry, bool wp);
> int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool wp);
> +int move_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset);
> void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg);
>
> int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index 2709a34a39c5..f0ded3b34367 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,10 @@ static void uffd_events_test_common(bool wp)
> char c;
> struct uffd_args args = { 0 };
>
> + /* Prevent source pages from being mapped more than once */
> + if (madvise(area_src, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_DONTFORK))
> + err("madvise(MADV_DONTFORK) failed");
Modifying events test is weird.. I assume you don't need this anymore after
you switch to the handle_fault() hook.
> +
> fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
> if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size,
> true, wp, false))
> @@ -1062,6 +1066,58 @@ static void uffd_poison_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> uffd_test_pass();
> }
>
> +static void uffd_move_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> +{
> + unsigned long nr;
> + pthread_t uffd_mon;
> + char c;
> + unsigned long long count;
> + struct uffd_args args = { 0 };
> +
> + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size,
> + true, false, false))
> + err("register failure");
> +
> + if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, NULL, uffd_poll_thread, &args))
> + err("uffd_poll_thread create");
> +
> + /*
> + * Read each of the pages back using the UFFD-registered mapping. We
> + * expect that the first time we touch a page, it will result in a missing
> + * fault. uffd_poll_thread will resolve the fault by remapping source
> + * page to destination.
> + */
> + for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr++) {
> + /* Check area_src content */
> + count = *area_count(area_src, nr);
> + if (count != count_verify[nr])
> + err("nr %lu source memory invalid %llu %llu\n",
> + nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
> +
> + /* Faulting into area_dst should remap the page */
> + count = *area_count(area_dst, nr);
> + if (count != count_verify[nr])
> + err("nr %lu memory corruption %llu %llu\n",
> + nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
> +
> + /* Re-check area_src content which should be empty */
> + count = *area_count(area_src, nr);
> + if (count != 0)
> + err("nr %lu move failed %llu %llu\n",
> + nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
All of above should see zeros, right? Because I don't think anyone boosted
the counter at all..
Maybe set some non-zero values to it? Then the re-check can make more
sense.
If you want, I think we can also make uffd-stress.c test to cover MOVE too,
basically replacing all UFFDIO_COPY when e.g. user specified from cmdline.
Optional, and may need some touch ups here and there, though.
Thanks,
> + }
> +
> + if (write(pipefd[1], &c, sizeof(c)) != sizeof(c))
> + err("pipe write");
> + if (pthread_join(uffd_mon, NULL))
> + err("join() failed");
> +
> + if (args.missing_faults != nr_pages || args.minor_faults != 0)
> + uffd_test_fail("stats check error");
> + else
> + uffd_test_pass();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Test the returned uffdio_register.ioctls with different register modes.
> * Note that _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE is tested separately in the zeropage test.
> @@ -1139,6 +1195,12 @@ uffd_test_case_t uffd_tests[] = {
> .mem_targets = MEM_ALL,
> .uffd_feature_required = 0,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "move",
> + .uffd_fn = uffd_move_test,
> + .mem_targets = MEM_ANON,
> + .uffd_feature_required = UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE,
> + },
> {
> .name = "wp-fork",
> .uffd_fn = uffd_wp_fork_test,
> --
> 2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 6:42 [PATCH v3 0/3] userfaultfd move option Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-09 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/rmap: support move to different root anon_vma in folio_move_anon_rmap() Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-12 22:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-13 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-19 15:19 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-09 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] userfaultfd: UFFDIO_MOVE uABI Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-09 14:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-09 16:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-09 16:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-09 16:29 ` Lokesh Gidra
2023-10-09 17:56 ` Lokesh Gidra
2023-10-10 1:49 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-12 20:11 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-13 9:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-13 16:08 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-13 16:49 ` Lokesh Gidra
2023-10-13 17:05 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-16 18:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-16 19:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-17 15:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-17 18:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-19 15:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-19 19:53 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-19 20:02 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-19 20:43 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-20 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-20 14:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-20 17:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-22 15:46 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-23 12:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-23 16:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-23 17:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-19 21:45 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-12 21:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-19 21:24 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-22 17:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-23 17:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-23 18:37 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-23 19:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-17 19:39 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-19 21:55 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-23 12:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-23 15:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-23 19:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-23 18:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-24 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-24 14:36 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-09 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-12 22:29 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-10-19 15:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-10-19 17:29 ` Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-19 19:33 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZShzSvrN7FgdXi71@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jdduke@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ngeoffray@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.