From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C2ACDB47E for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 12:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=KnS+aP4M; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4S6QFG1NMcz3cRd for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 23:05:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=KnS+aP4M; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::133; helo=mail-lf1-x133.google.com; envelope-from=fercerpav@gmail.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S6QDB6R8Mz2yDD for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 23:04:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-503397ee920so2499142e87.1 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 05:04:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697198672; x=1697803472; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X520iukCTJClLSLUWRjOO7Ibb+sEvTAMuRi0WpwIarI=; b=KnS+aP4MvkjAquxOs37SopCExDTaNyj/zmYpNtt3Kvv2i2KS6m7dbRgPFVKJwDIalL xEgmiWYce3c786IMOPv4Qu3L9YXsEGSZUimC4wUzlkMYLulsetV9/PDxx3cBMY82ZwrH xgNR5RA8XtTS5xjTib0E2L/L9tISM99/7BsrifKKX5cX5wHsKHxzmIJ5vNsDUxN+Rqw1 6kKeMO5aGH+M8yAeCSvYPsEZ1Woz/r1hRtUQ0IDnVJR74uLOhGMOAi5aap1aKx6qMwI8 X4haFh7LJFnxPCWmS5AoBlvcUoG9ePTAieYYOKkPtJNW9zhyJNE7nnXa0OgurT2pE/r6 H6hQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697198672; x=1697803472; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=X520iukCTJClLSLUWRjOO7Ibb+sEvTAMuRi0WpwIarI=; b=k1W8MJ70yhUtzjYIjWHKxnhY3xt9jvU18cHFtKerbWjTSfWWhsaZzH1aQbL7gptkGl d90Rg3g4Zb5/zT5x4poOv7hAJkmnYct0g5zMGC/ucBAWNGzke+arJO0gDpwuJvRLzG/m 4//3NUsX9oKfuN4idLvwLaSJdBXfcZxVIlDIwdqgI1S3oZRuZco26I9l5+oGLCTuCDOX J0qJCFrzW6cAwUJgRGlhUnRIzFZlzzDVWoqVfBDpP6nYx53ixn7HvUo6i3XLTvEfnD4V r3uGIagI1IsL6Wnb47h0KsXYA5VzEAlIwvvuGo12WCzHcRAAh989mPFNYWzv7xbL+39l IERA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxpl/2ME7GN2QjDVRMUyUVXVLL2TAhm8VESSEq+/YFbffJSdJuL gdkbfL0T2QRoHCS0Yte34EA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHKen8XjPOvmBomU45Yuh4V/z6QXSuElBNs6h818fqHeU+BmOXk26sCQ8oQF5VYDl0mT/55sA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:48f:b0:507:9701:2700 with SMTP id v15-20020a056512048f00b0050797012700mr2295203lfq.20.1697198671890; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 05:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.paul.comp (paulfertser.info. [2001:470:26:54b:226:9eff:fe70:80c2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o9-20020a05651238a900b00505666d024csm3325195lft.102.2023.10.13.05.04.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Oct 2023 05:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.paul.comp (home.paul.comp [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by home.paul.comp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22) with ESMTP id 39DC4RhV025629; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:04:28 +0300 Received: (from paul@localhost) by home.paul.comp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 39DC4RjE025628; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:04:27 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:04:27 +0300 From: Paul Fertser To: Alexander Amelkin Subject: Re: Add network RoutingPolicyRules at OpenBMC Networkd Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: raviteja bailapudi , Ratan Gupta , OpenBMC Maillist , Sunitha Harish , "johnathanx.mantey@intel.com" , "wak@google.com" Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" Hello, A short clarification inline. On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:18:33AM +0000, Alexander Amelkin wrote: > I may be missing some use-cases, but I gather link-local addresses are primarily > needed for discovery of newly installed OpenBMC > > machines before they are properly integrated into a DHCP-based or statically > configure network. Taking that into account, in my > > humble opinion, the best way would be to have link-local addressing enabled for > just eth0. To avoid potential of confusion it's important to note that the reasoning applies to legacy IP only, for IPv6 every interface normally has a link-local address at all times. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercerpav@gmail.com