From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR INTERFACE"
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: Consider INTx disabled when MSI/MSI-X is enabled
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:05:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSz8xu8E9-02Ej8D@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118154931.1928298-1-marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:49:23PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Linux enables MSI-X before disabling INTx, but keeps MSI-X masked until
> the table is filled. Then it disables INTx just before clearing MASKALL
> bit. Currently this approach is rejected by xen-pciback.
> According to the PCIe spec, device cannot use INTx when MSI/MSI-X is
> enabled (in other words: enabling MSI/MSI-X implicitly disables INTx).
>
> Change the logic to consider INTx disabled if MSI/MSI-X is enabled. This
> applies to three places:
> - checking currently enabled interrupts type,
> - transition to MSI/MSI-X - where INTx would be implicitly disabled,
> - clearing INTx disable bit - which can be allowed even if MSI/MSI-X is
> enabled, as device should consider INTx disabled anyway in that case
Is this last point strictly needed? From the description above it
seems Linux only cares about enabling MSI(-X) without the disable INTx
bit set.
>
> Fixes: 5e29500eba2a ("xen-pciback: Allow setting PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL too")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - allow clearing INTx regardless of MSI/MSI-X state, to be consistent
> with enabling MSI/MSI-X
> Changes in v2:
> - restructure the patch to consider not only MASKALL bit, but enabling
> MSI/MSI-X generally, without explicitly disabling INTx first
> ---
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c | 19 +++++++++++------
> .../xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 21 +++----------------
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> index 059de92aea7d..d47eee6c5143 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> @@ -288,12 +288,6 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev)
> u16 val;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE))
> - ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX;
> -
> /*
> * Do not trust dev->msi(x)_enabled here, as enabling could be done
> * bypassing the pci_*msi* functions, by the qemu.
> @@ -316,6 +310,19 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE)
> ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_MSIX;
> }
Since we are explicitly hiding INTx now, should we also do something
about MSI(X) being both enabled at the same time? The spec states:
"System configuration software sets one of these bits to enable either
MSI or MSI-X, but never both simultaneously. Behavior is undefined if
both MSI and MSI-X are enabled simultaneously."
So finding both MSI and MSI-X enabled likely means something has gone
very wrong? Likely to be done in a separate change, just realized
while looking at the patch context.
> +
> + /*
> + * PCIe spec says device cannot use INTx if MSI/MSI-X is enabled,
> + * so check for INTx only when both are disabled.
> + */
> + if (!ret) {
> + err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE))
> + ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX;
> + }
> +
> return ret ?: INTERRUPT_TYPE_NONE;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> index 097316a74126..eb4c1af44f5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> @@ -236,10 +236,11 @@ static int msi_msix_flags_write(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset, u16 new_value,
> return PCIBIOS_SET_FAILED;
>
> if (new_value & field_config->enable_bit) {
> - /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt types */
> + /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt type */
This comment needs to be adjusted to note that we allow enabling while
INTx is not disabled in the command register, in order to please
Linuxes MSI(-X) startup sequence.
FWIW, another option would be to simply disable INTX here once MSI(-X)
is attempted to be enabled, won't that avoid having to modify
xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type()?
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 15:49 [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: Consider INTx disabled when MSI/MSI-X is enabled Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-18 20:46 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-18 21:46 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-19 14:36 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-19 16:33 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-21 15:41 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-21 16:16 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-28 13:44 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-30 19:40 ` Jason Andryuk
2023-09-27 10:33 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2023-10-16 6:16 ` Juergen Gross
2023-10-16 9:05 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2023-10-16 13:04 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2023-10-16 13:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSz8xu8E9-02Ej8D@macbook \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.