From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F359369 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="U8m5Mlus" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1697761295; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8O1DQaljt+H62I0tLGc0kqUm5sOIzb3IYEn38CgT4Vc=; b=U8m5Mluseg7woVYfNNzXYDubTzJnAdd8r3jd66itHKH6xiMSdi3OtEE9/eUufar8MqqPrU Gs0SbJ44Qruk+VpCKn/U38eluYMUbiXb2Vx7INOIat8m0Eg+Xeb2amN/IkOM1Vxivxkv5E ORyQHUG4GQMs4KhrHPrzldjhKKn1Pww= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-9-bzvGtZerN-G9XP76KmwirQ-1; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 20:21:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bzvGtZerN-G9XP76KmwirQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D3E87A9FD; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.112.38]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC74111D794; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 08:21:26 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dan Carpenter , Philip Li , oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, Lorenzo Stoakes , lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: mm/vmalloc.c:3689 vread_iter() error: we previously assumed 'vm' could be null (see line 3667) Message-ID: References: <89caf59a-d3b9-409d-b1ae-9e370cb9ee7d@kadam.mountain> <20231018085248.6f3f36101cbdfe0990c8b467@linux-foundation.org> <20231019095030.7a1f3c93bc18511f52524aa8@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231019095030.7a1f3c93bc18511f52524aa8@linux-foundation.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 On 10/19/23 at 09:50am, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:28:21 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > > > I think this is not a real runtime bug. The only chance it can hapen is > > when (flags == VMAP_BLOCK) is true. That has been warned and could never > > happen. I updated patch log and paste v2 here. > > Thanks, I updated the changelog in-place. Thanks, Andrew.