All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/7] bpf: improve JEQ/JNE branch taken logic
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:33:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTXbl7MsUlXgg9d1@u94a> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231022205743.72352-2-andrii@kernel.org>

On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 01:57:37PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> When determining if if/else branch will always or never be taken, use

Nitpick: "... if an if/else branch will ..."
                 ^^

> signed range knowledge in addition to currently used unsigned range knowledge.
> If either signed or unsigned range suggests that condition is
> always/never taken, return corresponding branch_taken verdict.
> 
> Current use of unsigned range for this seems arbitrary and unnecessarily
> incomplete. It is possible for *signed* operations to be performed on
> register, which could "invalidate" unsigned range for that register. In
> such case branch_taken will be artificially useless, even if we can
> still tell that some constant is outside of register value range based
> on its signed bounds.
> 
> veristat-based validation shows zero differences across selftests,
> Cilium, and Meta-internal BPF object files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Otherwise,

Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-23  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-22 20:57 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/7] BPF register bounds logic and testing improvements Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/7] bpf: improve JEQ/JNE branch taken logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-23  2:33   ` Shung-Hsi Yu [this message]
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/7] bpf: derive smin/smax from umin/max bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-23  2:36   ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-24 13:08   ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-10-24 14:53     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-24 15:43       ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: enhance subregister bounds deduction logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-23  3:20   ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-23  3:56     ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-23 16:23       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-24 12:05         ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-24 12:22   ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-24 15:31     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-10-27  8:16       ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/7] bpf: improve deduction of 64-bit bounds from 32-bit bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: try harder to deduce register bounds from different numeric domains Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: drop knowledge-losing __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-22 23:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-24 13:40 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/7] BPF register bounds logic and testing improvements patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTXbl7MsUlXgg9d1@u94a \
    --to=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.