From: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Kira <nyakov13@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>,
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: Revert "staging: qlge: Retire the driver"
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:33:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZT_YntDOYEdlpx5x@d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023103001-drew-parmesan-c61a@gregkh>
On 2023-10-30 16:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:04:00AM +1100, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > This reverts commit 875be090928d19ff4ae7cbaadb54707abb3befdf.
> >
> > On All Hallows' Eve, fear and cower for it is the return of the undead
> > driver.
> >
> > There was a report [1] from a user of a QLE8142 device. They would like for
> > the driver to remain in the kernel. Therefore, revert the removal of the
> > qlge driver.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/566c0155-4f80-43ec-be2c-2d1ad631bf25@gmail.com/
>
> Who's going to maintain this?
I was planning to update the MAINTAINERS entry to
S: Orphan
when moving it back to drivers/net/. Would you prefer that I do that
change in a second patch right after the revert in staging? That would
certainly make things clearer.
> > Reported by: Kira <nyakov13@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > Once the removal and revert show up in the net-next tree, I plan to send a
> > followup patch to move the driver to drivers/net/ as discussed earlier:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231019074237.7ef255d7@kernel.org/
>
> are you going to be willing to maintain this and keep it alive?
No.
> I'm all this, if you want to, but I would like it out of staging. So
I'd like it out of staging as well. Since nobody wants to maintain it, I
think it should be deleted. However, my understanding is that Jakub is
willing to take it back into drivers/net/ as-is given that there is at
least one user. Jakub, did I understand that correctly?
> how about applying this, and a follow-on one that moves it there once
> -rc1 is out? And it probably should be in the 'net' tree, as you don't
> want 6.7 to come out without the driver at all, right?
Right about making sure 6.7 includes the driver. The 'net' tree is
usually for fixes hence why I would send to net-next. So the driver
would still be in staging for 6.7 (if you include the revert in your
6.7-rc1 submission) and would be back in drivers/net/ for 6.8.
> > +QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER
> > +M: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
> > +M: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com
> > +M: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
> > +L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > +S: Supported
> > +F: Documentation/networking/device_drivers/qlogic/qlge.rst
> > +F: drivers/staging/qlge/
>
> It's obvious taht these people are not maintaining this code, so they
> should be dropped from the MAINTAINERS file as well.
I agree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-30 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 15:04 [PATCH] staging: Revert "staging: qlge: Retire the driver" Benjamin Poirier
2023-10-30 15:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-30 16:33 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2023-10-30 18:42 ` Benjamin Poirier
2023-10-30 21:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-31 7:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 6:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-07 2:15 ` Benjamin Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZT_YntDOYEdlpx5x@d3 \
--to=benjamin.poirier@gmail.com \
--cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyakov13@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=svenjoac@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.