From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Andrew Theurer <atheurer@redhat.com>,
Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Sebastian Jug <sejug@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] blk-mq: don't schedule block kworker on isolated CPUs
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 07:45:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTcFhmdAPL0LQD7J@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013124758.1492796-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 08:47:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Kernel parameter of `isolcpus=` or 'nohz_full=' are used for isolating CPUs
> for specific task, and user often won't want block IO to disturb these CPUs,
> also long IO latency may be caused if blk-mq kworker is scheduled on these
> isolated CPUs.
>
> Kernel workqueue only respects this limit for WQ_UNBOUND, for bound wq,
> the responsibility should be on wq user.
>
> So don't not run block kworker on isolated CPUs by ruling out isolated CPUs
> from hctx->cpumask. Meantime in cpuhp handler, use queue map to check if
> all CPUs in this hw queue are offline, this way can avoid any cost in fast
> IO code path.
>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Theurer <atheurer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sebastian Jug <sejug@redhat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - remove module parameter, meantime use queue map to check if
> all cpus in one hctx are offline
Hello Guys,
Ping...
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 12:47 [PATCH V2] blk-mq: don't schedule block kworker on isolated CPUs Ming Lei
2023-10-18 0:52 ` Joe Mario
2023-10-23 23:45 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-10-24 16:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-25 1:05 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTcFhmdAPL0LQD7J@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=atheurer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sejug@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.