From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C37C00A8F for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234140AbjJXKYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 06:24:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48352 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234285AbjJXKYO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 06:24:14 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [IPv6:2001:780:45:1d:225:90ff:fe52:c662]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE74BA for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [78.30.35.151] (port=44116 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvEZz-005uGi-JF; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:24:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:24:06 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Thomas Haller Cc: NetFilter Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 1/3] tests/shell: add "bogons/nft-f/zero_length_devicename2_assert" Message-ID: References: <20231023170058.919275-1-thaller@redhat.com> <24637db2fe827e321ea152b5b24cfa3a29d3660d.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <24637db2fe827e321ea152b5b24cfa3a29d3660d.camel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Tue, 2023-10-24 at 11:57 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > Series aplied, thanks. > > Thank you. > > > > > After all these updates I see this failure: > > > > W: [FAILED]     1/1 testcases/sets/elem_opts_compat_0 > > > > I: results: [OK] 0 [SKIPPED] 0 [FAILED] 1 [TOTAL] 1 > > > > when running tests. > > > > Hm. I don't get such failure (Kernel 6.5.6-200.fc38.x86_64). > But regardless of that, I don't think that my patches had anything to > do with that test, do they? > > > Can you provide more information? Can you bisect the failure? > > Could you share: > > make && ./tests/shell/run-tests.sh ./tests/shell/testcases/sets/elem_opts_compat_0 -x -k > grep -R ^ /tmp/nft-test.latest.*/ /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/times:2.3 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/times:3067.20 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/times:3069.50 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/times:0.12 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/times:3069.38 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/times:3069.50 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after:table ip t { /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after: set s { /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after: type inet_service /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after: counter /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after: timeout 30s /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after: } /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/ruleset-after:} /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/rc-failed:2 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/name:testcases/sets/elem_opts_compat_0 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/testout.log:Command: testcases/sets/elem_opts_compat_0 /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/testout.log:testcases/sets/elem_opts_compat_0: 20: Syntax error: redirection unexpected /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-testcases-sets-elem_opts_compat_0.1/rc-failed-exit:2