From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F2715491 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WPNH1g2N" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40859c46447so29958815e9.1 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:51:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698231118; x=1698835918; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cv65HA03cvoAKx8a2KmloKz5yACTW5awrrDOvOUGaOc=; b=WPNH1g2NuJ46K57h2ZWH/xnGC1n2KucF+iHOv81s6VNJ5s5LQrwfOUli08/oyLFTx1 s2cVLjd/txdY1atSVMBFfkgNc24ZhzfzQN80xDBkUyzJmnHONJmXbbKl7ktl4s6RXTdv K8lAz37I0Una6C0W6pYLJ1VQOmWFuW+wl4n+6aGvvB7ms40XZY/e2NoDadrgMjzqg8vm 18lYEWuny8LX9zZFU948ZytCLaxMvnR2LLJ7sa32Ong9tdTRFXZsTZ9KUPn5LwPB+jvb Cy9lV4DweJtPbF0JYkYGIeZ8QRkQONMlvx4RH6W9VkQBEDXwebakR1JCo7CEyPgJHSEj mR9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698231118; x=1698835918; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cv65HA03cvoAKx8a2KmloKz5yACTW5awrrDOvOUGaOc=; b=UuxoSxp945EaXFkGLFo1IrYmXrePVxZzcDxARygudagBAqyPMAJtElaXkSw0wxKwcH J1XHMHZTtXeW2xEcsgFV+A6tEC8l/6oiS5liUEiqsgblQLxnKKWBrjdxfUA3gRtFm5WY nKZqJ/q8yAFY3PcUiKyN7IMO4SWHatE+JEMZlAwIgNXSM+H3Alpzg5j8j32gQsgiunTf DKZi2TiFf8XLn21scG7kZeyIxiXgPeDJgi4KcR0+PpTsWwmpp6EEqrLr0Clxp2TiYUF6 w1MCRno8vTnCw02Ts/HpSaqNe2XSgn9C43W9yfzY/7jhSNPVXuaZOJKNDQYkppQLi+Mc JcYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqzOT6kd07wUIJf7+ux+WIKTnNF3QIzK6VJ8f75Jch7Ci38UKk j8HUKeisZzFPvt6lsM8RQ+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9tisrZljoEq5Fuh1o5TH+dXqa0jPky6iprufzEjvQSQltz33lDSlYc2FHgH12nLqZ2wpqMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1f90:b0:405:92f9:b090 with SMTP id je16-20020a05600c1f9000b0040592f9b090mr11656642wmb.14.1698231117943; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17-20020a05600c231100b00401d8181f8bsm18898939wmo.25.2023.10.25.03.51.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:51:56 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.199-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20231024083326.219645073@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231024083326.219645073@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:36:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.199 release. > There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:32:45 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5376 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5377 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip