From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0080915491 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="aRi5WwHX" Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-32caaa1c493so3821996f8f.3 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698231198; x=1698835998; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E5LFOX0gmykKgdLOW/m7PRk1qIDkKpMeejYtgVYKiAg=; b=aRi5WwHXF9G7rYj/7xmR+1DwO9uP17n/5LvZrE1gkZJ5Tf0Q8zBM8RC72TDhRI5P7C v8o02TeB3FN8jY5peAVznA7GWuHtNnbAmz0ePuk06WD54BI5Eo7ULu3FzJSAp1HUE8fw 1jdTjn+LiE7yDl6GJpBm58qVplpCL8I3qy9zADNdyM+J3tjfE5vRT84EntfYhTfP6nEv h4J6jKGbz716996RGxWrllgg9pjPZQ9wd2qcFq1xzWpMDPCX8YrjODX3zY/cJqtNHvpv 9mAMrAn6S4+fdTMbN1PGIm3PMYfTWl+PnZjhe63eHEcJSR/Md7uf+8B9lGhHPsMGFoPd Swng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698231198; x=1698835998; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=E5LFOX0gmykKgdLOW/m7PRk1qIDkKpMeejYtgVYKiAg=; b=Cvn2pAqw3CUYevlWkidCw5ZHP864SvYdQvRVvcBSzRBz1urWKQi4FR5AV5Qjy7i1// INySE0XqGC0D+z2jd+8/ErT4EvLi8Ahpi9dgKO86LhIaVWfFd/Nr7YEBA4dQ4MWcDR3t tuFKeQ1hVhIjqoxHWlir2nFH4RlhpY+NWIcKivpZlpgG4qEpNIlMDlARP8KH6byWcSMD dp3R3x87OqN984P21d3zR02MdmJRLE70S9CyUDygL8oxPoP6AKdjHuSiUv+96N8RzEBH k8wtfXswOS2seCysq+CVtOhLdwAfPwGeMQx3/zmjnf6uc8Y1ytSqWsqxrOxweyX5r8Ts 6c9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YynS5CDnZbgaLcuVnjJQpWmbOxSzfTaWVDb6GM1ElmbdtylPBaA 9QnXpZHa0Hrloc4KklWBZtg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHm4rhFsIfSunj99etgP4L3hKz3Kf6mT85Ndo9cH1jm/mZT7VsHlOrM9UgiVd/BbfdlfX7xMw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:660e:0:b0:32d:8872:aacb with SMTP id n14-20020a5d660e000000b0032d8872aacbmr10935716wru.53.1698231197566; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1-20020adff8c1000000b0032da75af3easm11793086wrq.80.2023.10.25.03.53.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:53:15 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/135] 5.15.137-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20231024083327.980887231@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231024083327.980887231@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:36:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release. > There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:32:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5379 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5381 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5380 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip